Wednesday, 2 July 2025

Talking About Sex Too Much With Friends



https://megjohnandjustin.com/sex/talking-sex-much-friends/


This episode we addressed a question sent in by a listener about talking about sex with their friend. Specifically they wanted to know what to do when most of their conversations with their friend revolve around sex, sometimes around other people and in workplace contexts, and they would like to talk about other topics sometimes too.



We started the show with a couple of caveats. First off of course we don’t want to shame people for being interested in sex. Generally speaking, it’s great if sex can be a topic of conversation that friends can talk openly about. It would be wonderful if people did this a lot more in our culture which has so much shame around sex. Second it’s worth thinking about who does and who doesn’t get to talk about sex in our society. Often it’s culturally accepted that more normative people get to mention their sex and relationship lives in a way that less normative people don’t, in the same way that we see far more representations of those kinds of sex and relationships in the media (e.g. heterosexual, monogamous, couple relationships). So, for some people, talking about sex as a non-normative person can be an antidote to the shame of having their sex lives erased.

That said, there are certainly some possible consent issues here.

First, it’s worth attending to where talking about sex strays into actually having sex. Things like talking dirty and sexting count as having sex. Whereas talking about your sex lives with no arousal on the part of either friend doesn’t count as having sex. But there is a grey area between these where one or more person might be getting a frisson out of talking about sex with a friend, either because they want to be sexual with that friend and it’s a kind of flirtation, or they just find it exciting to talk about sex. Like all kinds of sex that’s only okay if both people are consenting to it. It is possible that discomfort on the part of one person might be because they’re picking up that this sex talk is in the grey area and therefore not consensual. That’s definitely worth raising if you feel able, and it should be on the person who is finding it sexy to be checking out the consent of what they’re doing.

Even if the conversation is very clearly in the ‘friends talking about their sex lives’ category, consent is an issue whenever one person is dominating or controlling what gets to happen in a relationship or interaction, for example if all the shared activities are the things they most enjoy, or if all the conversation is on topics they are most interested in. Ideally the person with the most power in the relationship would take responsibility for ongoing consent check-ins that the other person is comfortable, and getting their needs met from the relationship/conversations too, and that this is balanced and mutual. For example, culturally men and people in powerful positions tend to speak more in conversations than women and people in less powerful positions, so it’s important that they take some responsibility for making enough space for people with less power and privilege to be equally involved. There’s more about navigating consent in our video on the topic: you might think about what a second and third handshake approach might look like in relation to conversation topics.

In terms of what you can do if the other person isn’t attending to these imbalances between you, you could open up a meta-conversation about the kinds of things you talk about together, maybe using the Venn diagrams from our relationship user guide to get explicit about what topics you are each interested in and where the overlaps might be – recognising that this can change over time and that’s okay. You could explore why sex is spoken about so much in this relationship. For example it could be that your friend has nobody else they feel safe talking about these things with – in which case they might explore online or offline groups, or consider if it’s possible to bring this into their other friendships to take the pressure off this one. Again it could be good practice in all relationshi​ps to have regular check-ins about the kinds of things you end up talking about and whether everyone’s desires and needs are being met by this.

© Meg-John Barker and Justin Hancock, 2019

SOURCE:

Peace, wisdom and resilience for a changing decade



Our editor Dr Jon Sutton reports from the opening ceremony of the 19th European Congress of Psychology, in Paphos, Cyprus.

01 July 2025

Over many years, and several European Congresses, I've seen a fair few 'Psi' symbols turned into a tree for a conference logo. But, as Conference Chair Dr Eleni Karayianni pointed out in this opening ceremony, there's something particularly fitting about the olive tree. It signifies peace, wisdom, resilience: core values driving psychologists in their mission to support human wellbeing. 'Let this be a space,' she continued, 'to innovate, collaborate and translate' in order to face the challenges of what the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations have termed 'the 2030 agenda'.

Poly Gregora has been advocating for mental health in Cyprus since she was diagnosed with bipolar disorder almost 20 years ago. Here, she deployed the myths and tales of her land – including three beautifully animated short films, directed by Markos Kassinos – to remind us that truth and meaning can be found not only in science, but in story. Oral traditions bring to life forgotten faces from the past, a way to reflect and make meaning in an increasingly chaotic world.

Many of these myths are grounded in fear, confusion, change. And so through the films we heard of hostile forces (very much a psycho-political backdrop to this event), of lost beauty, of passion and love. There are a lot of huge rocks scattered across the island, in strange formations and unusual shapes. Cypriots have woven tales around these rocks and how they ended up where they did (including Petra tou Romiou, shown above). When the rocks splash into the ocean, said Kassinos, the concentric circles spreading out from them serve as messages and emotions from a parallel world, the 'truth of life'. Such stories are also 'tools for reflection', Gregora said, showing that we can – as she has, as an Expert by Lived Experience – turn our greatest fears into assets.
'A clear, rational, evidence-based understanding of reality'

Next up, the incoming President of the Cyprus Psychologists' Association, Dr Evita Katsimicha, urged that 'Psychology can and must be involved to meet the challenge of the decade ahead'. Professor Christoph Steinebach, at his last European Congress as EFPA President, welcomed 'Mrs President', noting that 'Perhaps the world needs more Mrs Presidents'. He insisted that although 'the sheer pace and complexity of global crisis can feel overwhelming… Psychology must, and wants to, step forward to help'.

In this endeavour, Steinebach said, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals should be our guide. Noting our proximity to the foundations of stoicism, he called for 'a psychological science that is based on a clear, rational, evidence-based understanding of reality'. Practice must be research-informed, and research practice-informed.

Complex times also call for tricky balancing acts, and Steinebach encouraged us to escape the 'ivory tower of pure research', while also ensuring that Psychology doesn't descend into 'mere activism'.

There's sure to be lots to explore over the coming days in this context. I will be chairing discussion panels on digitalisation, climate change, and the European Year of Mental Health; alongside others on policy making, open science and children's mental health; plus countless papers and posters. I'll do my best to update this page as the conference progresses.

SOURCE: