Wednesday, 10 December 2025

Growing up with grandparents in the house can lead to more negative attitudes towards the elderly


A new study has found that people who had grown up with an elderly person had significantly lower opinions of the elderly than those who had not.

13 July 2020

By Emma Young



What happens if you grow up with a grandparent living in your home? Does the prolonged contact counter prejudices, biases and stereotypes of the elderly? Or might it instead encourage negative perceptions of older people as being slow, angry or sickly, for example?

These are important questions, partly because in some countries, though not all, an increasing number of elderly people are moving in with family members. In the US, for example, 15% of older adults are now living in someone else's household, up from 7% in 1995.

Now a new paper, published in Social Psychology, by Brian T Smith and Kelly Charlton at the University of North Carolina, suggests that this trend could be causing undesirable outcomes: people in the study who had grown up with an elderly person had significantly lower opinions of the elderly than those who had not. However, these respondents did at least report less anxiety around their own ageing process.

Smith and Charlton studied 309 Americans, all recruited online. Of these, 194 reported growing up with an older adult — and 80 of these people said that the older adult in their home had suffered from a serious illness.

All the participants completed a series of surveys that explored, among other things, their current levels of contact with elderly people, the positivity (or otherwise) of this contact, their general attitudes towards elderly people, and also their anxieties about growing old themselves.

The analysis revealed that people who'd grown up with elderly people had lower opinions of older adults (this was especially true of those who'd grown up with an older adult who had been sick). The analysis also revealed that people in this group had greater levels of current anxiety about interacting with older adults. Overall, "our findings indicate that even years after a young adult has presumably moved out of the home, growing up in that home with an older adult had a significant negative effect on opinions of the elderly," the researchers write.

This finding contrasts with other work suggesting that contact with 'out'-groups (such as minority groups) can counter prejudices. However, the researchers did observe that participants who had grown up with an older adult and who then managed to maintain frequent contact with elderly people did have more positive current opinions of older adults. Among this group, the older adult who'd lived at home was less likely to have suffered from an illness.

Living with someone with a mental or physical illness can cause chronic strain and impact the health of others in the house, the researchers note. It often means that everyone in the house becomes a caregiver and, as the pair writes, "the effects of being a caregiver are generally negative, associated with severe negative and physical outcomes".

Given all this, it's surprising that people who'd grown up with an elderly person also reported being less anxious about their own ageing. But the researchers suspect cognitive dissonance could be at work here: "Younger adults who are faced with the realities of ageing (even if the older adult in their life is not seriously ill) may feel threatened by this. To reduce their discomfort at the idea of becoming older, they may tell themselves that their aging outcomes will be different."

There are various limitations to the study. All the participants were American, so whether the same results would apply elsewhere is not clear. Also, the researchers didn't ask the participants directly about their opinions of the older adult that they grew up with.

Still, the work does suggest that if a grandparent — especially a sick one — moves in to a family home, this will not necessarily improve the attitudes of children in the house towards older people. Parents may need to consider the quality of the relationship their children have with older people in their lives, and do whatever they can to encourage a positive relationship — especially if a grandparent is sick.


SOURCE:


So, you’re about to become a grandparent?




Terri Apter with some evidence-based tips, drawn from her new book 'Grandparenting: On Love and Relationships Across Generations'.

13 February 2025



Becoming a grandparent changes your relationship with every member of the family. Suddenly you are a parent of a parent who has their own view of what's best for their child. You are overwhelmed by an attachment to the new family member, but you have no direct control of their care. In this under-explored aspect of family life, I found – both in my own experience and in my research – many surprises.

So, here's my list of challenges you can expect, and how best to meet them.


1. In the early stages, be prepared to receive more criticism of your input than gratitude for your motives

Parents' brains are working overtime to learn about their own child. Grandparents' 'help' can interfere with their concentration, and heighten anxiety about their own parental skills. If you get some version of 'back off' when offering good advice, try not to be offended. The bad temper will soon pass.
2. When helping out with a grandchild, try to avoid an 'I know best' tone of voice

I was surprised how often grandparents declared with a dogmatic certainty, 'He's tired. He needs to be put down,' or, 'She's over-stimulated. We need to turn out the lights.' Grandparents generally have more experience than new parents in dealing with babies, but they also have less authority. Also, remember that baby care advice changes a lot in a generation, so you may discover you seem more old-fashioned than wise. This doesn't mean your advice is never welcome.
3. An accompanying joy of connecting to your new grandchild is witnessing your child becoming a parent…

But you may also find yourself newly (and critically) assessing your child-in-law: 'Are they pulling their weight or supporting your own child sufficiently?' Your own child is unlikely to find this criticism supportive.
4. At some point the parents will accuse you of 'spoiling' your grandchild

Children spot the difference between parents' rules and grandparents' house rules, so some discrepancy in levels of indulgence and discipline do no harm. But take your cues from parents as to which of their rules about behaviour or gifts or activities are red lines.
5. The geography of your home will be transformed during grandchildren's visits

Some new grandparents are disconcerted as baby paraphernalia and toys are scattered throughout the house. (See photo, above, of me with my own grandchildren.) Soon, everything in the house becomes a child's toy. Try to conserve energy for a post-visit clean-up!
6. The most common advice grandparents hear is, 'Bite your tongue.' Try to find a way around this.

Silencing yourself to avoid conflict may avoid open conflict but it limits your relationship with the parents. Instead, try to express your views in the form of a question or open conversation. "Do you think the child might like…?" signals that you see the parent as expert without having to silence yourself.'
7. Your confidence that you know your grandchild will constantly be challenged

Grandchildren change rapidly, and as they grow they need the people close to them to keep up. It's wise to monitor those grandparent exclamations of delight that warmed an infant but infuriate a six-year-old. It's worthwhile making the effort to learn about their new interests. Even a surly teen is likely to be responsive to a grandparent's genuine interest in who they are and who they will become.
8. You might have less than generous feelings towards the other grandparents

'Why does their religion/language/custom get priority?' is something some grandparents found themselves wondering (a concern that was inconsistent with their self image of tolerance and generosity). But if you feel shut out by the parents you're justified in challenging this exclusion. Begin the conversation with your own child, focusing on what you would like, rather than on your complaints about the other grandparents.
9. Don't be surprised if you feel back to where you were as a parent yourself – torn between wanting to have time to do your own thing and responding to others' urgent demands

One third of working mothers rely on grandparents for some regular childcare, and grandparents want to support their own child's career and they want to engage with their grandchild. But they can also feel over-stretched and taken for granted. Try to look at competing demands as opportunities and options.
10. This relationship has surprisingly long term value for you both

Close bonds with grandparents provide children with a buffer from common adverse experiences such as parents' divorce. An active relationship with grandchildren also contributes to grandparents' health and longevity. Grandparents who engage with their grandchildren have a reduced risk of developing dementia compared to those in their age group who do not. It's win/win, so worth the work. Grandparenting: On Love and Relationships Across Generations is published by September (Duckworth).



SOURCE:


Thursday, 4 December 2025

Damage across the generations


A Mother/Grandmother’s perspective on family estrangement; with comment from Dr Terri Apter (University of Cambridge).

21 November 2025

Two years ago, our lives changed. My husband and I had been away for a month, and we returned home to provide childcare for our grandchildren as planned. During the holiday, connection with our daughter had seemed to dwindle. We'd been sending photos and messages, with one or two going unanswered. But when we still hadn't caught up to make the arrangements and the week was already underway, it worried us. Our daughter's detachment, and lack of any interest in our lives, had been troubling us.



We were about to be cast out into a wilderness. There was no tragedy you might expect preceding these events. No divorce, major illness or addiction to contend with. There was no background of feuds or dysfunction. We looked after our grandchildren regularly, providing help with their childcare since they were born. There was no conflict around the usual cross-generational triggers. We were in agreement with our daughter and her husband about the children's best interests, and happy to take guidance from them.



My daughter had had a lot of stresses – illness in the family, a house move, a change of job, plus a hangover from the pandemic to deal with. We looked for practical ways to help where we could. We made allowances for her coldness.



My husband called her to sort out the arrangements, and asked her to open up about what was wrong. Looking back, the effort was clumsy and clearly ill-timed. In the course of the call he told her he loved her and that she mattered to him. He wanted to know what was the cause of the distance that had come between us, and what could be done about it. She reacted very badly; she seemed angry, said he was putting pressure on her, and cut him off.



There followed a week where we gave her space and hoped she would come round. She didn't. We haven't seen or spoken to her since – two years now.



This is an appeal for psychologists, and any others with influence, to understand the costs of adult children going 'no contact' with their parents, and the casualties when grandchildren are also involved. Should this ever be validated or encouraged, aside from the important exclusions of serious cases of physical, emotional or sexual abuse? Nobody would begin to argue that in those serious cases it is not entirely right and appropriate; but beyond these circumstances, would you defend or even encourage an adult child to take action such as this, resulting in damage across the generations? To make this choice rather than to work instead at finding a solution? And how much help is out there for families in these circumstances?



A shocking realisation

We each apologised to her in the early weeks by email, for contributing in any way to her stress. We asked for guidelines that would help us move forward. Our aim was to reconcile… that was the important thing. But as all this was unfolding and I struggled to make sense of it, an alarming idea occurred to me – was she possibly, even unconsciously, blaming us for her troubles? Turning on a safe close target?



We didn't address that directly – we loved her unconditionally, and simply appealed to her for perspective – it all seemed out of any proportion. Her written reply, when one did come, was so angry that we reeled from the shock of it.



We pulled back for a bit and then, rather than trying to defend ourselves, we asked for compassion and focused on requests to see our grandchildren. But eventually, we were blocked from all communication. We continue to send our grandchildren cards and gifts by post, but with no acknowledgement that they had reached them. There are no Zoom calls or photographs, no updates. There's a blocking of information from any other sources which even, it became apparent, involved recruiting extended family to the campaign.



We reached out for help from our close core family group – her brother, her aunt and others. But there followed a shocking realisation that there was no desire for reconciliation. Mediation was rejected out of hand. I have written many hundreds of words, but none of it penetrates the wall that has been built to keep us out. Many of these messages are met with complete silence. I learn painfully what gaslighting is and how utterly wounding silent treatment can be. I wake up daily with a feeling that my chest is constricted, and then remember what is weighing down on me.



Occasionally I have some respite. I dream about them. I'm hugging them, and feel convinced for a few moments that we can fix this. It doesn't last. Nothing has worked.

An ugly story

How have we come to this? What have our relations with our families been like to bring about this outcome? Have they been poor, fractious, toxic even? All I can say is that we had no previous indications of this. In a way that feels worse, because what is there to fix? We have somehow become bad – villains, even. Is there no recognition of years of practical emotional and financial support? It's not that we expected reciprocity. It was not transactional, given as it was out of love and a belief in showing that love through actions. But there is no goodwill here for us and no compassion, and that alarms me. What kind of thinking leads to this?

I am realistic enough to know that we are being judged by others on how this looks. We must have done something awful to bring about such an extreme reaction from our daughter. When our son and his wife throw their lot in with them and also cut us off… well, surely that's further confirmation that we deserve this.

What is the best we can expect now? Is there any sort of closure for grandparents subjected to estrangement at the hands of their own adult children? Where do you go with it? What do you do with the hurt? Is it possible to repair and rebuild shattered identities, which were almost wholly 'mother and grandmother', 'father and grandfather'? And is there realistically potential to heal in these final decades of life, when everything has been upturned so brutally?

All our relationships have been impacted, but others have been fatally damaged as the ripples of a family estrangement extend in widening circles around us. How do I relate any more to friends, contemporaries who are almost all grandparents? If I avoid the pain, and also the effort this now requires of me, then isolation and loneliness become my companions. It is a difficult story for us to share and difficult for others to hear, even with those who still do care about us. What kind of people can we be, whose son and daughter have rejected them? And what words of comfort can be offered anyway? It's a very ugly story.

A call for more status

The road to recovery requires a belief that things can get better, but we feel cast aside and worthless. We are grief-stricken, and at times we allow ourselves privately to be angry. I dream that I am utterly cast adrift and have lost my bearings. That I don't know this place. I desperately want to go home or at least find a safe harbour, but I know that this is really about family and how all my efforts are failing.

Grandchildren have no automatic rights for the relationship with their grandparents to be maintained. Grandparents have no rights for contact with their grandchildren, even though their role is recognised as important. We are advised that in the family courts there would be no requirement for parties to attend mediation. But does this protect the rights of children to their extended family life and the value that many grandparents bring to it?



And yet this close relationship results in benefits for both generations, research shows. There needs to be more focus on it, as well as the potential for real psychological harm to both young and old. It should be better recognised in law – not to ultimately deny a parent's rights, but to recognise it as an important welfare issue and something worth preserving.


'A balanced view of parental efforts versus a child's experience is, in the context of estrangement, unattainable…'

A comment from Dr Terri Apter, University of Cambridge.

Family rifts are a staple of stories, from the Bible to Greek myths to contemporary plays, novels and TV series. But it is only in the past decade that psychologists have begun to explore how and why one family member deliberately breaks off contact with another. In 2015, Hidden Voices: Family Estrangement In Adulthood, a collaboration between Dr Lucy Blake and Becca Bland, explored the experiences of 800 people estranged from their families. In 2023, Joshua Coleman's book Rules of Estrangement mapped the varied and very painful dynamics of family estrangements, primarily from the parents' perspective. In my 2025 book Grandparenting: On Love and Relationships Across Generations I explore estrangement through the consequential loss of access to grandchildren.

There are as yet few models of this complex and often chaotic dynamic. As in so many cases when an adult child and parent are estranged, the author's daughter initiates the estrangement for reasons her parents cannot fathom. The question she poses to 'psychologists (and others with influence)' is whether a child's rejection of a parent 'should ever be validated or encouraged' where there is no evidence of physical/sexual abuse. Yet in one-to-one therapy, clients often seek resonance for their belief that a difficult parent/child relationship results from the parent's 'toxicity' or 'narcissism'.

Coleman, however, who works with many estranged parents, insists that the toll on the rejected parents should be a significant consideration. The costs in terms of pain, loneliness, self-doubt and a consequent loss of relationships with, for example, grandchildren, are high. Perhaps the core therapeutic principle of empathy with and reflection of the client's perspective needs to be challenged?

The grandparent's question appears measured and reasonable, but in the context of family estrangement it is largely irrelevant. Any approach based on the assumption that justifications and harms can be weighed fairly on each side is likely to be futile. The perspectives of child and parent in such cases are often unrecognisable to one another. The parent has warm memories of wonderful times with the child and knows they had only good intentions, while the adult child reels off a staggering list of harms that a parent inflicted and perhaps continues to inflict. Refuting these accusations is likely to be seen as proof of the parent's unwillingness to understand the child. Perhaps the adult child's view is manipulated – for example, by a partner who for some reason wants to alienate their in-laws – but a parent's self-defence is no match for whatever influence is currently shaping the child's views. If the child blames a parent for how their own life turned out, then a parent's reminder of the support and encouragement they offered will simply reinforce the child's belief that their parent wants to make them feel guilty or 'bad'. Appeals to the child to consider the parent's need for connection are also likely to be counterproductive; perhaps such appeals reinforce the child's view that the parent thinks only of themselves.

A balanced view of parental efforts versus a child's experience is, in the context of estrangement, unattainable. The rejecting child will shut down in the face of a parent's pleas to be given a fair hearing. Such efforts will be interpreted as attempts to prove the child 'wrong'. However painful, Joshua Coleman advises, a parent must listen to the child's complaints and find some kernel of truth. Empathy with the child's accusations is difficult but necessary. So to some extent the rejected parent needs to 'validate' the child's view, but this does not require self-flagellation. The message, 'I know you are doing this because you genuinely feel this is best for you and I want to understand why', may reassure the child that it is safe for them to repair the relationship.

But what if, as in this case, the rejecting child is unmoved by such parental efforts? What if they ignore or 'ghost' the parent, meeting every gesture of reconciliation with cold silence? There is little a parent can do to shift the gears of this relationship if a child remains stuck in the grooves of resentment. The most a parent can do is signal their willingness to reconnect. At intervals, they can send a message conveying good wishes and a hope that soon the child will be willing to open up and assure the child that when they do, you will listen without defending yourself or arguing against their position.

It is estimated that 1 in 7 grandparent is denied easy access to grandchildren by an estranging child or child-in-law. Establishing the precise number is difficult because of the stigma and shame surrounding family estrangement. They worry, as this grandparent does, that others will conclude there must be something wrong with you if your own child keeps their child from seeing you. Until such a time as adult child and parent are reconciled – efforts that can take years – what can grandparents do to alleviate what many refer to as the 'raw wound' of a grandchild's absence in their life?

Grandparents have no automatic rights to see their grandchildren. They can apply to the court for a Child Arrangement Order, providing they can show that contact with them is in the best interests of the child. But such recourse is unlikely to mend the rift with their child. Deprived of contact with and even information about their grandchild, they worry about the negative things the parents might say about them. They worry that the grandchild might conclude that the grandparent does not want to see them. Pat Hansen, whose daughter cut ties with her when her granddaughter was four-years-old, mended 'the hole in her heart' by writing letters in preparation for the day she might see her granddaughter again. In these letters she built a picture of herself to counter the very negative views of her daughter. She includes accounts of where she goes, what she sees, and what experiences she would like to share with granddaughter.

The pain of estrangement rarely ebbs with time, but, Coleman advises, parents should 'compartmentalise' this grief to limit its impact. A child takes this drastic step for their own varied reasons. But when you have done your best, their decision should not ruin your life.



The author responds:

I have two aims in shining a spotlight on this painful experience. Many grandparents/parents caught up in family estrangement have been 'good enough' parents or better. It becomes utterly impossible to improve the situation where dark motives are attributed to their every effort to reconcile. And perhaps there is nothing counselling/psychology services have to offer to grandparents beyond advice to 'compartmentalise the grief' (if that is achievable for some). But if grandparents are largely on their own dealing with this trauma, what about grandchildren who are caught up in this? What do we all owe them? The child has a fundamental right to an ongoing loving relationship with other significant adults in their family life. Do we place value on the extended family, on grandparents and their often important nurturing role in their grandchildren's lives? Or do we see them as disposable? This is not an attempt to undermine parental rights but rather in the absence of evidence of harm, a presumption that the grandchildren/grandparent relationship should be protected. Those family connections can be at times vital to children, providing them with stability and a sense of legacy. Dr Apter herself talks elsewhere about the important role of the grandparent and quotes as an example the feeling of safety many grandchildren report having in their grandparents' company. And with the reports of growing rates of anxiety amongst schoolchildren we need to take this seriously. Is there a place for this to be recognised and encouraged in therapy, even when 'no contact' is the choice a parent makes for themselves in this situation? There is an injustice at the heart of this. Children have rights that should not be overlooked.



SOURCE:

Wednesday, 26 November 2025

Non-binary insights slip through the cracks in sexuality research



A recent review paper unpicks methodological hurdles and highlights the need for mindful research inclusion of those beyond the gender binary.

14 November 2025

By Emily Reynolds


Over the past decade, research into the sexuality of gender non-conforming people has grown rapidly. Despite this increased interest, however, those who identify as non-binary often remain under-represented within broader research on gender and sexuality. This poses a problem not only for non-binary people and their partners in terms of being more widely understood, but also for professionals seeking to update their knowledge in order to provide support who might be left with relatively little peer-reviewed information to draw on.

To assess the size of this research gap, Fraedan Mastrantonio and team from the University of Southampton draw on twelve years' worth of papers on non-binary people's sexuality. Writing in Archives of Sexual Behavior, they present a rounded image of what's been investigated so far, and find that non-binary people have some things in common with their binary transgender peers — but that the measures used in research often fail to fully capture their experiences.

The team gathered studies published between 2012 and 2024 focusing on non-binary sexuality, including satisfaction, pleasure, fantasy, relationship quality, and sexual distress. They then reviewed each of the 44 eligible papers based on who participated, how gender identity was explored, what variables were measured, and any main results.

Firstly, while many of the studies were high quality, the team found a number of interesting methodological issues. One of the primary issues was that non-binary identities were often labelled as 'other' or write-in, meaning that different non-binary identities were often lumped together in one group. This prevents researchers from being able to compare and contrast these groups, which potentially results in missing nuanced differences between their experiences. In most studies it also wasn't clear if non-binary participants also identified as transgender.

In terms of orientation, non-binary people overwhelmingly gravitated towards non-normative labels. Queer was the most frequently used; pansexual, bisexual, and asexual also appeared regularly. Interestingly, non-binary people often used 'other' options when available, suggesting that standard categories don't always feel like a good fit. Some studies suggested that non-binary people were more likely than both cis and binary trans people to report attraction to all genders, and were more likely to have had non-binary partners. They were also more likely to report non-monogamous relationships, suggesting more openness to alternative relationship structures.

There were mixed results around risk. Some studies suggested that young non-binary people engage in higher-risk sexual practices than their peers, such as unprotected sex or sex under the influence of drugs and alcohol. One found that non-binary people assumed to be female at birth felt less able to negotiate use of condoms compared to trans women, hinting at specific vulnerabilities, whereas others found no significant association between non-binary identity and risk. Despite this complexity, relationship satisfaction didn't differ between the various gender identities investigated: there were no consistent differences in how satisfied participants of these studies felt with their sex lives or relationships.

With that said, these studies also identified barriers to feeling fully satisfied. Non-binary people were less likely than binary trans individuals to seek or receive gender-affirming care, such as hormones or surgery, and more likely to report being denied treatment when they did seek it. People assumed to be female at birth in particular reported higher levels of 'gender insensitivity' in sexual health settings, including transphobia and normative assumptions. Non-binary participants also reported greater gaps between how they see themselves sexually and how they would ideally like to be, as well as more sexual distress than cis people in at least one study.

Finally, the team explored a set of other sexual variables, mostly studied in single papers. Measures of sexual assertiveness showed few differences between cisgender and non-binary individuals, suggesting that the ability to express one's needs are not necessarily different. Non-binary participants did however report fewer problematic beliefs about consent: they were less likely to think consent is implied or becomes less necessary in longer relationships.

The review's impact is two-fold: as well as collating interesting insights from a broad range of studies, it also highlights that research on non-binary sexuality can be limited in scope and methodological depth, failing to fully capture people's sexual experiences. This limited the investigation's conclusions in itself, and underlines the need for proper consideration to be put into properly capturing both data about individuals' gender identities (rather than just providing an 'other' option) to allow for more fine-grained analyses.

Future research needs to centre non-binary participants from the outset, the team argue, focusing on using inclusive terminology and research designs, and incorporate validated tools that reflect people's lived realities. This would be one more step towards ensuring that the sexual health and wellbeing of non-binary people are properly understood, and that non-binary people can access wider support for their sexual wellbeing similar to those with binary genders.

Read the paper in full:
Mastrantonio, F., Kovshoff, H., & Armstrong, H. (2025). Non-Binary People's Sexuality, Sexual Health, and Relationship Satisfaction: A Review of 12 Years of Quantitative Research (2012–2024). Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-025-03224-0


SOURCE: