Thursday, 30 May 2019

Study of long-term heterosexual couples finds women over-estimate and men underestimate their partner’s sexual advances




Imagine that, during a quiet evening at home watching a movie with your romantic partner, you feel intense sexual desire and sensually put a hand on your partner’s thigh. Your partner does not respond and blithely continues to watch the movie… Is your partner truly not interested in sexual activity, or did she/he simply miss your cue?

So begins a new paper, published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, that explores how accurate heterosexual people are at judging their partner’s attempts to initiate sex – in terms of their ability to the spot their partner’s cues, and also their overall impression of how often their partner makes sexual advances. It’s important, because as the researchers, led by Kiersten Dobson at the University of Western Ontario in Canada, note, “Sexual satisfaction is associated with relationship happiness, whereas sexual dissatisfaction is associated with relationship dissolution.”



Other studies have found that in casual, short-term relationships, men tend to overestimate a partner’s sexual interest (while women either underestimate it, or show no bias either way; they’re fairly accurate). An evolutionary psychology explanation for a male tendency to think women are more interested than they actually are is that – in a casual relationship – while incorrectly perceiving interest and being rejected might not feel great, missing the signs of interest, and so a chance to mate, is worse.

To explore what happens in longer-term relationships, the researchers recruited 120 heterosexual couples aged 18-51 (but with a mean age of 22), who had been together for between three months and 30 years.

An initial, exploratory study involved half the couples. The participants all privately completed a battery of questionnaires, which included questions about how often they and their partner attempt to initiate sex and how often they and their partner turn down an opportunity for sex. Then they rated how often these events typically occur over a one-month period (from “never” to “more than 11 times a month”).

Next, they read short descriptions of 29 behaviours that might indicate sexual interest (such as “I put my hand on my partner’s thigh”) and were asked to rate the degree to which they and they partner use each of these behaviours to indicate that they are interested in having sex. The participants also completed questionnaire assessments of their sexual satisfaction and love for their partner.

The results showed that both men and women were pretty good at identifying the behaviours that their own partners use to indicate that they’d like to have sex. However, on average, the women overestimated the number of times that their partner tried to initiate sex, whereas the men got it about right.

A second, similar, confirmatory study, involving the other 60 couples, found that the participants were again pretty good at recognising the behaviours that their own partner uses to indicate interest in having sex. In this group, the women also thought that their partners made more sexual advances than they actually did (according to the partner data), but only marginally. However, the men underestimated their partner’s advances.

Again from an evolutionary psychology perspective, the researchers speculate that for men in a long-term relationship, compared with a casual one, the costs associated with missing the signs of sexual interest may be lower (as there will be plenty more opportunities to have sex) and the costs of rejection will be higher (as being rejected by a long-term partner could be more painful). But as the results from the two studies were in part inconsistent, more work is needed before any firm conclusions on bias can be drawn, they note.

When it came to sexual satisfaction and love, people who overestimated their partner’s sexual advances reported feeling more sexual satisfaction. This might be because they felt more attractive and desired by their partner, the researchers suggest.

On the other hand, people with partners who under-estimated their own advances reported feeling more love and greater sexual satisfaction – perhaps because the under-estimater feels motivated to do something to strengthen the relationship, which may then make their partner feel more satisfied.

As the researchers note, “Navigating sexual activity can be difficult, especially when partners’ behaviours that indicate their sexual interest are subtle.”

The researchers would like to see studies investigating how perceptions – and misperceptions – of sexual advances may affect relationships in the long term. But it would also, I think, be interesting to see a more real-time version of this study. Since other work has found that men under-report their own sexual intentions, it’s hard not to wonder whether the women in this study were really over-estimating their partners’ advances. Asking participants to report back daily, or every time they thought they or their partner had made a sexual advance – and whether or not it led to sex – would surely provide more accurate data than retrospective estimates of what happened in the course of a month.

SOURCE:

The Dissatisfaction of Being Sexually Rejected By A Partner Lasts Longer Than The Pleasure Of Having An Advance Accepted





Sex is an important part of most romantic relationships – and when couples are not on the same page about their sex life, it can become a source of frustration. Research has found that couples have sex about 1 or 2 times a week, but about half of sexual advances between partners go unfulfilled.

A preprint uploaded recently to PsyArXiv sheds some light on how responses to sexual advances influence individuals’ feelings of sexual and relationship satisfaction. The study suggests that while having an advance accepted leaves partners feeling more content, this effect may be short-lived compared to the dissatisfaction of being rejected.



To get a peek into the bedrooms of 115 heterosexual couples (participants were aged between 19 and 64), Kiersten Dobson from the University of Western Ontario and colleagues asked them all to keep sex diaries. Every day for 3 weeks, both partners independently logged whether they or their partner had made a sexual advance, and if so, whether that led to sexual activity. They also recorded their daily levels of satisfaction with their sexual relationship, as well as their relationship generally, answering questions such as “How good is your relationship compared to most?”

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the researchers found that accepting a sexual advance, or having an advance accepted by the partner, resulted in an increase in both sexual and relationship satisfaction that day compared to other days.

On the other hand, being rejected decreased sexual satisfaction. But intriguingly, if the participant themselves was the rejecter – that is, if they shunned an advance from their partner – their sexual satisfaction still increased. (Neither being rejected nor being the rejecter had any effect on general relationship satisfaction.)

Changes in sexual satisfaction could still be detected days after advances were made. The team found that the boost in satisfaction from having an advance accepted persisted for 24 hours, with the slump of being rejected lasting twice as long. And the gratification that came from being either an acceptor or a rejecter lasted a remarkable 72 hours.

It might seem especially surprising that rejecting a partner’s advances gives a boost in sexual satisfaction, particularly one that appears to last for three days. But rather than reflecting some pleasure derived from rejecting someone, the researchers suggest that being approached for sex leaves a person feeling desired, so enhances sexual satisfaction even when no actual sex ends up happening.

The fact that the negative effects of being sexually rejected by a partner last longer than the positive effects of being accepted mean that making an advance can be a risky move, the authors say. “The act of making a sexual advance may be a high-risk situation for romantic partners, which may in turn lead those who feel less sure of their partner’s response to an advance to take the risk of making an advance less often,” they write. This could ultimately lead to fewer opportunities to bolster intimacy through sex.

The study doesn’t reveal anything about whether there is a way to buffer against the negative effects of rejection, though, or how different individuals respond. For example, the same team previously found that men underestimate, and women overestimate, how often their partners make sexual advances – though gender didn’t seem to play a role in the new study. However, it would be interesting to know whether other individual differences might alter people’s responses to acceptance or rejection.

SOURCE:

Monday, 27 May 2019

Με ποιον τρόπο μπορούν οι ηλικιωμένοι να ζήσουν περισσότερο. Τι δείχνει νέα αμερικανική επιστημονική έρευνα






Οι ηλικιωμένοι που πιστεύουν ότι η ζωή τους έχει έναν σκοπό, τείνουν να ζουν περισσότερο. Συγκεκριμένα παρουσιάζουν μειωμένο κίνδυνο ανάπτυξης καρδιακών νόσων και ασθενειών του κυκλοφορικού και του πεπτικού συστήματος, σύμφωνα με μια νέα αμερικανική επιστημονική έρευνα.


Τα δεδομένα της μελέτης, που δημοσιεύτηκαν στο αμερικανικό ιατρικό περιοδικό «JAMA Network Open», δείχνουν ότι όσοι πιστεύουν πως η ζωή τους δεν έχει ιδιαίτερο σκοπό, έχουν μεγαλύτερη πιθανότητα να πεθάνουν νωρίτερα, καθώς τείνουν να έχουν χειρότερη σωματική και ψυχική υγεία (ιδίως οι πιο μοναχικοί συνταξιούχοι).

Η βασική συντάκτρια της έρευνας καθηγήτρια Λέι Πιρς από τη Σχολή Δημόσιας Υγείας του Πανεπιστημίου του Μίσιγκαν τόνισε πως «η συσχέτιση μεταξύ της αίσθησης του σκοπού και της μειωμένης θνησιμότητας έχει αποδειχθεί πολλαπλώς από έρευνες».

Οι ερευνητές συνέλεξαν δεδομένα από 6.985 συμμετέχοντες άνω των 50 ετών, γεννηθέντες μεταξύ του 1931 και του 1941. Αφού οι τελευταίοι απάντησαν σε ερωτήσεις σχετικά με την αίσθηση σκοπού στη ζωή τους (όπως «μου αρέσει να κάνω σχέδια για το μέλλον και να εργάζομαι για να τα κάνω πραγματικότητα»), έγιναν αντικείμενο παρατήρησης από τους ερευνητές από το 1992 έως το 2006. Στην περίοδο αυτή πέθαναν 776 από το σύνολο των συμμετεχόντων.

Τα αποτελέσματα έδειξαν ότι οι συμμετέχοντες που είχαν χαμηλότερη αίσθηση σκοπού, είχαν υπερδιπλάσιες πιθανότητες θανάτου στην πορεία της έρευνας, συγκριτικά με εκείνους που θεωρούσαν ότι η ζωή τους έχει ένα νόημα. Αντίστοιχα αυξημένη φάνηκε και η πιθανότητα προσβολής από νοσήματα της καρδιάς, του κυκλοφορικού και του πεπτικού. Δε βρέθηκε όμως η ίδια σχέση για τον καρκίνο και τις ασθένειες του αναπνευστικού. Παράλληλα τα επίπεδα στρεσογόνων ορμονών παρουσίαζαν αύξηση σε εκείνους που είχαν χαμηλά «σκορ» στην αίσθηση σκοπού.

Σύμφωνα με τους ερευνητές, υπάρχουν πολλοί λόγοι για τους οποίους ο σκοπός της ζωής μπορεί να παρατείνει τη διάρκεια της ζωής. Προηγούμενες μελέτες έχουν δείξει ότι η ισχυρότερη αίσθηση ευεξίας, συνδυαστικά με την αίσθηση του σκοπού, μειώνει την ενεργοποίηση των γονιδίων που δημιουργούν φλεγμονές στο σώμα. Η φλεγμονή έχει συνδεθεί στο παρελθόν με αύξηση του κινδύνου πρόωρου θανάτου.

Οι άνθρωποι με περισσότερες ευθύνες και υποχρεώσεις στη ζωή τους, που τους προσδίδουν μια αίσθηση σκοπού, είναι λιγότερο πιθανό να πεθάνουν πρόωρα. Εφόσον μια τέτοιου είδους συσχέτιση τείνει να εδραιωθεί, σύμφωνα με τους ερευνητές, αξίζει να διερευνηθούν παρεμβάσεις που θα βοηθούν στο «χτίσιμο» της αίσθησης του σκοπού. Αν και η έννοια αυτή δεν έχει ξεκάθαρο ορισμό, συνιστά μάλλον αυτό που έχει αξία για τον καθένα ξεχωριστά (κοινότητα, επιτεύγματα, φήμη, πνευματικότητα κ.α.). Έχει επίσης δειχθεί ότι ο διαλογισμός και η γιόγκα μπορεί να ασκήσουν μια τέτοια θετική επίδραση. Πρόσφατες μελέτες αναδεικνύουν και τη σημασία του εθελοντισμού.

Ο Ρικ Μόριτζ, αναπληρωτής καθηγητής ψυχιατρικής και κοινωνικής εργασίας στο Ιατρικό Κέντρο του Πανεπιστημίου του Πίτσμπουργκ και μέλος του διοικητικού συμβουλίου του Ινστιτούτου Γήρανσης του Πανεπιστημίου Πιερ και Μαρί Κιουρί του Παρισιού, δήλωσε ότι «πιθανώς το κλειδί για την ανάπτυξη της αίσθησης του σκοπού, είναι να γίνουμε πιο αλτρουιστές και να υιοθετήσουμε περισσότερες συμπονετικές συμπεριφορές».

πηγή:


We Tell Our Kids That Hard Work Always Pays Off. What Happens When They Fail Anyway?


A star athlete at the college where I work recently stopped by my office. After committing a few unforced errors during a weekend match, she was — several days later — riven by self-criticism and distracted on the field.

“I can’t stop beating myself up,” she told me. “I’m at peak fitness, and I practice hard. How is this happening?”

This student, like many I teach, believes she should be able to control the outcomes of her life by virtue of her hard work. It’s a mentality verging on invincibility: a sense that all-nighters in the library, a jam-packed calendar and hours on the field should get her exactly where she needs to go in life. Nothing can stop me but myself.

I study and write about resilience in young adults, and I’m noticing a troubling spike in students like this athlete. Their faith in their own sweat equity confers a kind of contingent confidence: when they win, they feel powerful and smart. Success confirms their mindset.

The problem comes when these students fail. When they fall short of what they imagine they should accomplish, they are crushed by self-blame. If my accomplishments are mine to control, they reason, my failures must be entirely my fault, too. Failing must mean I am incapable, and maybe will be forever. This makes it incredibly difficult for students to move on.

We talk often about young adults struggling with failure because their parents have protected them from discomfort. But there is something else at play here among the most privileged kids in particular: a message transmitted to them by doting parents who have falsely promised them that they can achieve anything if they are willing to work for it.

Psychologists studying students in high-achieving schools have sourced this phenomenon to a misapplication of “mindset” research, which has found that praising children for their effort will increase academic performance. Developed by Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck and popularized in her 2006 bestselling book, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, mindset education has infiltrated the classrooms around the world. But a 2018 meta-analysisfound that while so-called growth-mindset interventions, in which educators respond to their students’ challenges by praising effort (“You worked hard!”) over ability (“You’re really smart!”), may benefit high-risk or economically disadvantaged students, they do not necessarily help everyone.

One possible explanation comes from psychologists Suniya Luthar and Nina Kumar, who argued in a research paper last year that teens growing up in wealthy, pressure-cooker communities are actually hurt by the message that effort equals success. For them, Luthar and Kumar wrote, “it is not a lack of motivation and perseverance that is the big problem. Instead, it is unhealthy perfectionism, and difficulty with backing off when they should, when the high-octane drive for achievements is over the top.”


The humbling, brutal, messy reality of life is that you can do everything in your power — and still fail.

When parents demand excellence in their kids while still promising them that effort is king, they tell them, wrongly, that they should be able to rise above any obstacle. But research has found that young people who push themselves onward in the face of unattainable goals experience physical and emotional stress. In a 2007 study by psychologists Gregory Miller and Carsten Wrosch, the authors determined that adolescent girls who refused to give up impossible goals showed elevated levels of CRP, a protein that serves as a marker of systemic inflammation linked to diabetes, heart disease and other medical conditions. A 2012 study by Luthar and Samuel Barkin showed a correlation between the “perfectionist strivings” of affluent youth and their vulnerability to drug and alcohol abuse, anxiety and depression.

The humbling, brutal, messy reality of life is that you can do everything in your power — and still fail. This is knowledge that comes early to underrepresented minorities on campus, including first-generation students and students of color. Their experience of discrimination and inequality teaches them early on to brace for what is, for now, largely beyond their control to change.

Yet for many others, the quixotic belief that success is always within their grasp is a setup. University of Chicago Professor Lauren Erlant calls this “cruel optimism,” or when the pursuit of a goal actually harms you because it is largely unachievable. The college admissions game promises young adults a meritocracy that will reward their hard work with entrance to the ivory tower – yet admissions scandals and ultra-thin acceptance margins make such a promise impossible to keep.

Adults help students pursue success in healthier ways in part by redefining failure as a feature, not a bug, of learning. At Smith College, where I teach, the Narratives Project asks students to explore how setbacks and missteps made them stronger or more effective. “It can be instructive to observe your own response when things don’t go your way,” said director Dr. Jessica Bacal. “It might reinforce your passion for the work you’re doing or send you in a whole new direction – and there’s nothing wrong with that.”

Luthar and Kumar urge parents and teachers to spend time helping students find purpose, or goals they both genuinely love to pursue and that make an impact on the world. Researchers have found that adolescents with purpose report greater life satisfaction, have a strong sense of identity and are more psychologically mature.

Instead of allowing our kids to beat themselves up when things don’t go their way, we might all pause to question a culture that has taught them that being anything less than overwhelmed is lazy, that how they perform for others is more important than what actually inspires them and that where they go to college matters more than the kind of person they are.

The point is not to give our kids a pass on working hard and doing their best. But fantasizing that they can control everything is not really resilience. We are harming our children by implying that they can bend life to their will, and as students walk across commencement stages this year, we would be wise to remind them that life has a way of sucker-punching us when we least expect it. It’s often the people who learn to say “stuff happens” who get up the fastest.

SOURCE:


Thursday, 23 May 2019

Αγάπα με χωρίς να με κρίνεις, χωρίς να με δικάζεις, χωρίς να με συγκρίνεις.






Γράφει η Λίνα Παυλοπούλου

Αχ… έλα και πάρε με αγκαλιά!
Να μου γλυκάνεις την καρδιά.
Έλα και δώσε μου το πιο τρυφερό σου χάδι!
Να μου ξυπνήσεις ότι κοιμάται.
Έλα και στάξε μέλι με τη ματιά σου!
Να μου γιατρέψεις ότι απέμεινε.
Έλα και ξάπλωσε πλάι μου!
Να ανασάνω δίπλα σου και πάλι.
Έλα και μείνε εδώ και αγάπα με όπως ακριβώς είμαι!



Εμένα! Όπως είμαι.
Αγάπα με χωρίς να με κρίνεις, χωρίς να με δικάζεις, χωρίς να με συγκρίνεις.
Εμένα! Όπως είμαι!
Να με καταλαβαίνεις.
Να με αφουγκράζεσαι.
Να με αφήνεις ελεύθερη.
Να με καρτερείς στους γυρισμούς μου.
Να μου επιτρέπεις το λάθος.
Να με συγχωρείς.
Να μ’ αγαπάς!
Εμένα! Όπως είμαι!
Με υπομονή.
Με ελευθερία.
Χωρίς εγωισμό.
Χωρίς ανταγωνισμό.
Απαλά, τρυφερά, γλυκά!
Έτσι σ’ αγαπώ κι εγώ!
Έτσι σ’ αφήνω να ανασαίνεις πλάι μου!
Δεν ξέρω άλλο τρόπο…

Πηγή:https://www.newside.gr/2019/05/agapa-me-xoris-na-me-krineis-xoris-na-me-dikazeis-xoris-na-me-sigkrineis/#(accessed 23.5.19)