Tuesday 30 January 2018

What Your Toilet Paper Reveals About Your Personality







This is the closest PsyBlog gets to toilet humour.



Do you hang your toilet roll with the end of the paper hanging ‘over’ or with the end hanging ‘under’?

According to a survey by Dr Gilda Carle, ‘over’ people are more assertive.

Assertive people are more likely to be in leadership roles and to have a take-charge attitude, says Dr Carle.

Those hanging the roll ‘under’ are more likely to be submissive.

Submissive people tend to be more agreeable, flexible and empathetic, says Dr Carle.

To create the toilet paper personality test, Dr Carle surveyed around 2,000 people of all ages, asking them whether they rolled the paper over or under.

Some people, Dr Carle has found, actually switched the toilet roll in other people’s houses (around one in five).

Naturally it was those ‘over’ people imposing their dominant personality on submissive ‘unders’.
The rich roll over

Rolling under might also be linked to lower earnings, another survey has found.

73% of those earning under $20,000 rolled under, while 60% of those earning over $50,000 roll over.


(Who knew there were so many surveys on toilet roll alignment?)





SOURCE:

Friday 26 January 2018

Dr. Estela Welldon: 'I speak my mind. Patients take that very well'

The radical forensic psychotherapist believes that behind all human perversion lies an envy of the pregnant woman's body. She talks about her own traumatic life – and the dangers of her job






We sit down to talk about serious subjects, sobering subjects, but my first meeting with Estela Welldon soon takes on a faintly hysterical hue. This pioneering forensic psycho- therapist, an Argentinian who has spent her life guiding criminals through psychoanalysis, talking through their cobwebbed unconscious, has just been giving a lecture to colleagues, and her voice is depleted, distinctly croaky. In a Brighton restaurant, over lunch, I have to lean in closely to hear her theories.




"Perversions are all really, symbolically speaking, attacks against the [pregnant] woman's body," she is saying. "Let's not talk any more about penis envy, envy to the breast, envy to the womb. Envy is towards the pregnant body. A fecund woman represents an erected penis, sperm flowing." Our waiter blanches as he approaches, and Welldon addresses him, without pause. "Do we have any sauce with this?" She gestures to our tandoori chicken. "Because I will need some sauce. Nice virgin olive oil?" He nods meekly. "That would be great!"

She turns to me. "Over the last five years I have had so many cancers. I have had one of my epiglottis, and in chemotherapy, a lot of the salivary glands have gone, so I need some lubrication. But so!" She takes a slug of wine. "We were talking about women, and there is something so appealing about a pregnant woman, but they are also the most vulnerable to attacks, even from their husbands or partners." All manner of crimes can be understood, symbolically, from this perspective, she explains. "In any attack against a house, for instance, taking things away from it, or shitting on it, it's always a representation of the mother's body that's being attacked".

Welldon had planned to have a big family herself until her husband, a psychiatrist, died suddenly at the age of 38. Their son, her only child, was nine months old. She had experienced another early bereavement, aged 11, when her 14-year-old brother died of complications related to appendicitis. "What has become very clear to me is that I had more traumas than many people – more traumas than many of my patients. But for some reason I am capable of dealing with that. And some people are not. And it is a question of being compassionate. It's possible to have many traumas, and survive them all, but become rather hard. But I feel compassionate about people who can't deal with their problems."

We talk about her most difficult, frightening clients, our conversation peppered with profanity, and I repeat everything loudly, to ensure I'm understanding her correctly. A man sits down at the piano behind us. He starts playing jazz classics at an aggressive volume. I find myself bellowing "so your client wanted to stick his umbrella up people's bottoms", to the accompaniment of A Nightingale Sang in Berkeley Square. Heads swivel. Forks clatter. I start to feel mildly beaten.

A few weeks later, we meet again at Welldon's London home, a warren of art, cushions and expensive chocolates that suits its owner's effusive nature. In her mid-70s, she is youthful, glamorous and unstintingly direct. She has shaped the whole field of forensic psychotherapy – she was founding director of the first diploma course in 1990 , founding president of its first professional organisation, the International Association for Forensic Psychotherapy, in 1991. And this year her ideas have been collected in the book, Playing with Dynamite: A Personal Approach to the Psychoanalytic Understanding of Perversions, Violence and Criminality.

The book comprises interviews with Welldon, and her essays on subjects such as perverted motherhood and Münchausen syndrome by proxy. I was nervous before reading it. There are areas of human behaviour I'm happy to leave vague. But Welldon has an ability to address them, both in conversation and on the page, in a way that allows you to peer closely without imminent danger of throwing up.

Welldon has been a pioneer in a field that most people, perhaps, would either find terrifying, or enter armed with naive, romantic rescue fantasies. In the book, she says she has always felt extremely comfortable working with the most difficult cases of sexual deviance or delinquency. I ask what gives her this capacity, and she says she has an "enormous amount of violence myself, and I think the patients know that too. People have said to me, 'You are so small,' and have asked if I've ever felt scared. I said no."

The only really worrying incident was when a woman insisted on bringing a gun to their sessions. "I said: 'Listen, I'm sure I'm going to give you an interpretation, and you're not going to like it, and I will be scared to do that because you will be carrying a gun.' She told me she had killed a lot of people in the past, but had never been caught."

The field often attracts "do-gooders", says Welldon, who are singularly ill-suited to it. The only physical attack she has ever witnessed at work took place when a colleague comforted a client by patting them sympathetically, prompting an explosive reaction. "Touching them?" she says, "No way. Also, if somebody's saying nobody wants them, and wants to talk about the parts of themselves that are bad, or hateful, they don't want to hear: 'You're actually really nice.' Fuck you! I mean, honestly, it's so condescending, and you're not seeing what the patient wants to give you.

"If you want to be loved and liked, don't go into psychotherapy. Because you have to put up with people hating you, because they have not been able to express that hatred to the real people who didn't take care of them, didn't welcome them, ignored them. Sometimes the people who were in charge of them as children were extremely abusive, physically or sexually, verbally, everything. And they couldn't express any anger, because they were completely dependent on them. So, in therapy, you have to take that hatred on." She and her colleagues have extensive psychoanalysis themselves, which helps with the impact of their work; also, she says, she has a hardness that makes it easier. "The first time someone said to me, 'You are so hard,' I said: 'Are you crazy?' And then I realised my own students have told me something similar, because I am really confrontational. I speak my mind. Patients take that very well."

Welldon grew up in Mendoza, Argentina, and began her working life teaching children with Down's syndrome, before deciding she would have more power and autonomy as a psychiatrist. After completing her studies, she went to work at the Menninger Clinic in Kansas, where she was given a job in a medium-secure unit, working with seriously disturbed patients.

One of these was a woman, originally from a small island in the China Sea, who had killed her three children – and claimed it was because she was struggling to feed them. Photographs soon appeared in the newspapers showing her fridge, packed full of food. With the help of a translator, Welldon gradually uncovered her story. The woman had been expected to go into prostitution in her early teens, to support her family, had rebelled against this, and felt she'd made a more positive life for herself when she met, and married, a black American soldier. But on arriving in the US with him, she found herself ostracised, as a result of endemic racism. She eventually had a psychotic breakdown, turning her violence on her children.

This action accords with Welldon's understanding, discussed in her 1988 book, Mother, Madonna, Whore, that while men tend to project their violence and perversions outwards, on to other people, "in women it is usually against themselves, either against their bodies", expressed in eating disorders, for instance, "or against objects they see as their own creations: their babies". In Playing with Dynamite, this difference is illustrated partly with reference to exhibitionism, and specifically flashing. While male exhibitionists tend to compulsively expose themselves to people they don't know, "women suffer from this compulsion only with other women to whom they feel a close attachment", Welldon writes.

In the 1960s, she came to work in the UK, eventually securing a position at the Portman Clinic in London, which concentrated specifically on treating perverse, delinquent patients through psychoanalysis. There, in 1981, Welldon started a regular group- therapy session, which included both victims and perpetrators of violence. I balk at this idea, but she explains that the participants were chosen through an extensive interview process, obviously agreed to the setup, and that having this mix in the room allowed victims to confront the type of people who had hurt them, and perpetrators to witness the ongoing damage caused by their behaviour. Welldon says some of the incest perpetrators she treated "were not aware of causing any damage – or only physical damage. Then, in the group, they see these women who are in their 30s and still suffering, and they become aware."

Her mind still teems with former patients. She tells me the story of one woman who had been the victim of horrendous maternal and paternal incest, went on to work briefly as a prostitute, before being employed by the church. Once there, says Welldon, "she began to steal enormous amounts of money, and nobody ever recognised it was her. You can see the elements there – the church represented her mother, the priest her father, and she was acting against them in a symbolic manner. She got so upset about not being caught that she had to go and tell the authorities, and then she came to group therapy."

Also in the group was a man who had been perpetrating incest with his young stepdaughter, and a female patient in her 30s who had been a long-term victim of incest. "This woman was very nice, like all these victims, very compliant, very passive, and one day she said: 'You know, I wasn't able to watch the programme I wanted to see last night, because my father rang up and talked for the full hour.' And the man said: 'Are you crazy? Didn't you tell your father – look, I will talk to you in an hour's time? You are still allowing your father to fuck you.'

"The woman went 'Arrrrrrrrgh'. She went absolutely crazy. Another time, she came from a weekend away, and said: 'I had a terrible time, because I told my parents a long time ago that I have become a vegetarian, and my father cooked sausages and bacon for me and I had to eat it.' And this guy, again, said: 'Do you realise how much you are collaborating in that situation?' And she went: 'What?' And she began to be able to express enormous anger. Another time, she came and said: 'The fucking bastard got what he deserved.' Her father had got cancer of the testicles. And then it was up to me to tell her that in her expression of revenge she was still very much attached to him."

The group was open-ended, and this woman remained in it for 17 years, eventually going on to have a good, loving relationship. The other woman, who had been working at the church, "said she was too damaged to have a relationship, or children. She just wanted to be able to get therapy so she could go out into the world and work efficiently and honestly. She stayed for four or five years, and then said, that's it. I thought that was very insightful on her part."

Welldon still works with patients, and writes and lectures frequently. Forensic psychotherapy is underfunded, she says, but over the course of her career, awareness of the underlying reasons for criminal behaviour has increased. "If you look, for example, at the recent riots, there were a lot of articles saying that these were conveying something specific, so there's far more recognition that there are social problems, and that these acts are related to inequalities."

Was she ever able to cure people of their perversions? "Oh, yes," she says. A perversion "is a component of the personality, and it is possible to cure it, although not with everybody – no way! The prognosis is far more favourable with women than with men … But the funny thing is – and I checked this with other colleagues – sometimes, when you feel almost at the point of despair, it's a turning point in the patient. So you can never be completely hopeless. Sometimes you could have spent 10 years working with someone, and just at the moment you are ready to say: 'OK, I cannot do any more here,' – she beams – "something happens."

SOURCE:

“Not as bad as you think”: women who’ve gone through the menopause have a more positive take than those who haven’t




Discussion of the menopause tends be negative. Take the video introduction to “menopause week” held this week on BBC Radio 4 and BBC Radio Sheffield. The well-meaning presenters talk of “distress”, the impact, the “troubling” changes, and “how to get through it”. Of course the aim is to support and educate, and it’s important to acknowledge the seriousness of some women’s problems. However, there’s arguably a risk that an overly negative tone perpetuates beliefs and stereotypes that may foster unjustified dread about the menopause.

In fact, according to a recent study in the Journal of PsychoSomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, involving nearly 400 women aged between 40 and 60, overall women have a positive view of the menopause. What’s more, women who’ve gone through the menopause have a more positive take on it than those who’ve yet to start or who are in the middle of it. “In other words,” write Lydia Brown at the University of Melbourne and her colleagues, “for most women the menopausal transition may turn out to be not as bad as they think”.



The researchers asked their participants to complete the Menopausal Representations Questionnaire that includes questions about symptoms they attribute to the menopause, their thoughts and beliefs about the consequences of the menopause, the menopause timeline, and their perceptions of control. The researchers also devised a new scale addressing the participants’ emotions in relation to the menopause.

For example, participants said whether they felt (or expected to feel) anxious or less confident; whether they thought the menopause would last a long time; whether they were anxious about it; whether they were, or would be, pleased to be free of the risk of pregnancy.

The women’s responses were positive overall. On average they disagreed that the menopause made them feel upset, angry or afraid, although they agreed it made them feel somewhat anxious and slightly more depressed. The women agreed most strongly with statements about what may be considered advantages to going through the menopause, such as the end of periods and the end of using birth control.From Brown et al, 2017

Among the sample, 54 of the women were premenopausal, 48 were in the early or later stages of the menopause, and 286 had finished going through the menopause. The postmenopausal women were more positive about the menopause than the women currently going through it, although this difference was modest. In terms of their emotions, the postmenopausal women were more positive about the menopause than the premenopausal women and those currently in the menopause, and the magnitude of this difference was “clinically significant”.



The researchers speculated that perhaps the more negative views and emotions of the premenopausal and early menopausal women is related to “affective forecasting theory”, which describes how we tend to overestimate the impact of future events on our emotions, and underestimate our ability to adapt and cope. Alternatively, perhaps the findings are explained by a more general trend for people to become more optimistic as they get older. Alternatively, or as well, maybe the postmenopausal women had developed more effective coping strategies over time.

Whatever the explanation, and while acknowledging that their study was limited by its cross-sectional design (it would be better to study the same women before, during and after the menopause), the researchers said their findings suggest that the more negative views held by premenopausal women may reflect a “degree of stereotype internalisation”. It may be “that the ‘dread’ of the upcoming menopause is culturally influenced”, they said, adding: “Our data show that cognitive and emotional representations of the menopause are most positive in the post menopause, when women have had the lived experience of the menopause”.

SOURCE:

Tuesday 23 January 2018

“Ο καρκίνος μου σε τρομάζει, το βλέμμα σου με πονά.”


Γράφει η :



Ίντα Ελιάου
Συμβουλευτική Ψυχολόγος / Chartered Counselling Psychologist (BSc, MSc, PGDip. MA)


Η πραγματικότητα είναι πως όλοι μας, περισσότερο ή λιγότερο, επηρεαζόμαστε από αυτό που βλέπουμε όπως και από τις πληροφορίες που λαμβάνουμε από το περιβάλλον μας. Όλοι έχουμε στερεότυπα. Στερεότυπα που άλλοτε μας προκαταβάλλουν θετικά και άλλοτε αρνητικά. Έτσι, παρόλο που όλοι μας μοιραζόμαστε ένα κοινό χαρακτηριστικό, την διαφορετικότητά μας (ως προς το φύλο μας, το γένος μας, τις σεξουαλικές μας προτιμήσεις, την καταγωγή μας, το χρώμα μας, τις παιδικές αρρώστιες που περάσαμε κ.α.) ξεχνάμε πως αν και κατά φύση διαφορετικοί, είμαστε όλοι ίσοι. Και έτσι πολλές φορές τρομάζουμε στη θέα του διαφορετικού κ οδηγούμαστε σε προκαταλήψεις ή και σε διακρίσεις ακόμα που πονούν.

Τι είναι η προκατάληψη; (Hogg & Vaughan, 2010).

Υπάρχουν πολλοί διαφορετικοί ορισμοί. Μερικοί υποστηρίζουν πως προκατάληψη είναι μια αρνητική στάση που υπάρχει απέναντι στα μέλη μιας συγκεκριμένης κοινωνικής ομάδας απλά κ μόνο επειδή τα άτομά της ανήκουν στην ομάδα αυτή. Π.χ. κάποιοι είναι προκατειλημμένοι απέναντι στους γκέι, άλλοι απέναντι στις γυναίκες, άλλοι απέναντι στους οπαδούς του Ολυμπιακού, άλλοι απέναντι σε όσους νοσούν από AIDS (Ταινία Φιλαδέλφεια με τον Tom Hangs) ή από καρκίνο αντίστοιχα. Βλέπουμε πως υπάρχουν πολλές μορφές προκατάληψης:

Η προκατάληψη λόγω ασθένειας είναι αυτή που μας αφορά σήμερα. Μια παραδοσιακή θεώρηση της προκατάληψης (Allport, 1954b), είναι ότι έχει 3εις διαστάσεις:

- τα στερεότυπα= η σκέψη, οι πεποιθήσεις π.χ. όλες οι γυναίκες είναι κακοί οδηγοί ή η αρνητική πεποίθηση ότι τα άτομα με καρκίνο είναι καταθλιπτικά.

- προκατάληψη= ισχυρά συναισθήματα σχετικά με το αντικείμενο της στάσης π.χ. θυμός όταν βλέπουμε γυναίκα οδηγό ή ο φόβος μην με επηρεάσουν αρνητικά καρκινοπαθείς που πιστεύω ότι είναι άτομα καταθλιπτικά.

Πολλές φορές αυτά τα δύο κομμάτια οδηγούν στην 3η διάσταση που είναι

-η διάκριση= δηλαδή μια συμπεριφορά αλλά κ η πρόθεση για συμπεριφορά. π.χ. κορνάρουμε, βρίζουμε μια οδηγό ή αποφεύγω τον καρκινοπαθή ή προσπαθώ να τον αποφύγω.

Θέλω να τονίσω λοιπόν πως η προκατάληψη σε βάρος των καρκινοπαθών αποτελεί απλά μια από τις χιλιάδες μορφές προκατάληψης που υπάρχουν γύρω μας καθημερινά. Και είναι σημαντικό να το δούμε υπό αυτό το πρίσμα διότι όταν βιώνουμε την συγκεκριμένη προκατάληψη νιώθουμε πολύ μόνοι κ χάνουμε τη γενικότερη εικόνα πως τελικά εμείς οι άνθρωποι ψάχνουμε λόγους για να τονίσουμε τη διαφορετικότητά μας.



Γιατί συμβαίνει αυτό;

Μας αρέσει να πονάμε τους συνανθρώπους μας; Όχι. Οι Crocker, Major & Steele, 1998, υποστηρίζουν πως οι άνθρωποι αποκτούν μια σχετικά θετική αίσθηση εαυτού κ της κοινωνικής ταυτότητας τους αν συγκρίνουν τους εαυτούς ή την ομάδα τους με άλλα άτομα ή ομάδες που είναι στιγματισμένα γιατί με αυτόν τον τρόπο δεν κλονίζεται η δική τους εύθραυστη αίσθηση βεβαιότητας για τη ζωή κ της δυνατότητας ελέγχου πάνω της (Hogg, 2000b; Jost & Kramer, 2003).

Ρωτάμε: Τι είναι στη σωματική ασθένεια συγκεκριμένα που προκαλεί το στιγματισμό, τον οίκτο κ την απόρριψη πολλές φορές; Σε κάποιο βαθμό, η ασθένεια αντιπροσωπεύει μια απόκλιση από τον κανόνα ή ένα ιδανικό μας. Ό,τι ζωή σημαίνει υγεία. Έτσι, στιγματίζουμε την απόκλιση, βάζουμε μια ρετσινιά, μια ταμπέλα, όχι για να πονέσουμε τον άλλο αλλά για να μην πονέσουμε εμείς οι ίδιοι, για να νιώσουμε εμείς πιο ασφαλείς καθώς μ αυτόν τον τρόπο είναι σαν να διαχωρίζουμε τον εαυτό μας κ να λέμε ‘ουφ. Εμείς είμαστε υγιείς. Εκείνοι, ‘οι άλλοι’ είναι οι άρρωστοι. (Dovidio,Major,&Crocker,2000; Smith, 2007).


Τι καθορίζει λοιπόν το πότε οι φυσικές «διαφορές» ακόμα κ στην ασθένεια, οδηγούν στην κοινωνική απόρριψη;

Έχουν υπάρξει πολλές μελέτες που συνέκριναν ποικιλία ασθενειών που διαφέρουν σε ένα ευρύ φάσμα συμπτωμάτων, πρόγνωσης και σοβαρότητας και να προβλεφθεί κ να κατανοηθεί η απόρριψη κ ο κοινωνικός στιγματισμός (e.g. MacDonald & Hall, 1969; Shears & Jensema, 1969; Tringo, 1970). Οι Jones et αϊ. (1984) επανεξέτασαν πολλές από αυτές τις μελέτες και προσδιόρισαν έξι συγκεκριμένες διαστάσεις σημαντικές για το στίγμα στις ασθένειες: απόκρυψη (concealability), πορεία (course), αναστάτωση (disruptiveness), προέλευση (origin), αισθητική (aisthetics) και κίνδυνος (peril). Η σωματική ασθένεια ποικίλει και στις έξι αυτές διαστάσεις.




Η απόκρυψη είναι ο βαθμός στον οποίο μια ασθένεια φαίνεται ή μπορεί να καλυφθεί. Π.χ. Το AIDS δεν φαίνεται ενώ ο καρκίνος φέρνει πτώση μαλλιών. Ό,τι φαίνεται μας τρομάζει περισσότερο γιατί μας φέρνει αντιμέτωπους με την πραγματικότητα μια ασθένειας έναντι της ανάγκης μας για μια ζωή με υγεία. (Hebl & Mannix, 2003). Αυτή η διάσταση σχετίζεται κ μ αυτή των αισθητικών ιδιοτήτων (aisthetics), που αναφέρεται στον σωματικό αντίκτυπο της ασθένειας. Ορισμένες ασθένειες είναι παραμορφωτικές (μαστεκτομή), ενώ άλλες έχουν μικρή επίδραση στις αισθητικές ιδιότητες (Rosman, 2004; Chapple et al., 2004).

Η πορεία αναφέρεται στη σταθερότητα ή τη μεταβλητότητα της κατάστασης. Είναι κάτι χρόνιο; Κάτι ιάσιμο; Τι πορεία μπορεί να έχει μια ασθένεια; Ανάλογα με την πιθανή πορεία μιας ασθένειας εγείρονται κ αντίστοιχοι φόβοι μας.

Η αναστάτωση αναφέρεται στο βαθμό διαταραχής που προκαλεί στη ζωή του ατόμου κ στις σχέσεις του η συγκεκριμένη ασθένεια. Ζω όπως πριν σαν να μην συμβαίνει τίποτα που προκαλεί μια ψευδαίσθηση υγείας στους άλλους ή αναγκάζεται να αλλάξει ο τρόπος ζωής μου κάτι που σφραγίζει την ασθένεια στους γύρω μου;

Η προέλευση περιγράφει την αιτία που κάποιος αρρώστησε απ τη συγκεκριμένη ασθένεια. Είναι κάτι κληρονομικό; Κάτι που κολλήσαμε; Κάτι που προκαλέσαμε στον εαυτό μας ή που απλά έτυχε; (Bishop, 1987). Η προέλευση αποτελεί πολύ βασική διάσταση του στιγματισμού στις φυσικές ασθένειες (Crandall, 1994). Οι Weiner κ.ά. (1988) διαπίστωσαν ότι όταν τα στίγματα (π.χ. τύφλωση, έλλειψη στέγης, καρκίνος, παχυσαρκία, επιληψία) θεωρούνται ελέγξιμα, οδηγούν σε μεγαλύτερη θυμό κ απόρριψη από ό, τι όταν θεωρούνται ανεξέλεγκτα. Όταν δηλαδή, ένα άτομο θεωρείται υπεύθυνο για το αποτέλεσμα ενός αρνητικού γεγονότος, οι αντιδράσεις θα περιλαμβάνουν θυμό, απόρριψη, ευθύνη και αποφυγή βοήθειας και επαφής. Κ μάλιστα, η συμπεριφορική αιτιότητα δεν είναι το αν ο καρκινοπαθής π.χ. είναι όντως υπεύθυνος για την εμφάνιση του στίγματος του, αλλά αν θεωρείται υπεύθυνος. Γι αυτό π.χ. οι παχύσαρκοι άνθρωποι ή όσοι πάσχουν από καρκίνο του πνεύμονα, προκαλούν πιο αρνητικές αντιδράσεις διότι θεωρούνται υπεύθυνοι για το κακό που τους βρήκε. (Chapple, Ziebland, & McPherson, 2004) (Eldridge, 2011).

Τέλος, ο κίνδυνος επικεντρώνεται στο πόσο επικίνδυνη είναι η ασθένεια αυτή για τον ίδιο κ τους γύρω του, τόσο πραγματικά (π.χ. φόβος μόλυνσης του περίγυρου ή θανάτου για τον ίδιο τον ασθενή, Rozin, Markwith & Nemeroff, 1992), όσο και συμβολικά (π.χ. μπορεί μια ασθένεια να μην μπορεί να την κολλήσουμε –όχι πραγματικός κίνδυνος- αλλά να φοβόμαστε ότι θα στιγματιστούμε κάνοντας παρέα με κάποιον με μια συγκεκριμένη νόσο. Μιλάμε δηλαδή για την ηθική απόρριψη ενός ατόμου. Pryor, Reeder & McManus , 1991, Pryor, Reeder, Vinacco & Kott, 1989).

Όλοι οι ερευνητές συμφωνούν στο ότι οι προκαταλήψεις έχουν πολλές αρνητικές συνέπειες για το άτομο που διακρίνεται, αυτόν που νοσεί για π.χ. αλλά και για όσους διακρίνουν κ κατ’ επέκταση για όλη την κοινωνία.

Όσοι διακρίνονται: ανεξάρτητα από τον λόγο διάκρισής τους (Swim & Stangor, 1998; Crocker et al., 1998) (Ablon,2002)

-νιώθουν αδικία, απογοήτευση, θυμό, στεναχώρια

-βιώνουν διακρίσεις που οδηγούν σε λιγότερες ευκαιρίες καθώς δεν αντιμετωπίζονται ως ίσοι.

-επηρεάζεται η συμπεριφορά των ίδιων π.χ. αποτραβιούνται, απομονώνονται ή γίνονται επιθετικοί, προκλητικοί.

Οι καρκινοπαθείς συγκεκριμένα, πρέπει να ανταπεξέλθουν σε ένα καθεστώς μόνιμου οίκτου. Κρίνονται αποκλειστικά και μόνο από το γεγονός της ασθένειας αυτό καθεαυτό. Παύουν να είναι άνθρωποι με προσωπικότητα και χαρακτήρα-έχουν απλώς καρκίνο. Η υπενθύμιση αυτή γίνεται με το έντονο κοίταγμα στο κεφάλι που καλύπτεται από μαντήλι, με τις κινήσεις «φιλανθρωπίας» στα όρια της ταπείνωσης, με την αυτόματη όσο και υποκριτική συμπάθεια στο άκουσμα της λέξης «χημειοθεραπεία». (Hoffman, 2005).

Βλέπουμε λοιπόν ότι πλέον οι διακρίσεις είναι συγκαλυμμένες σε σχέση με παλιότερους καιρούς που π.χ. δεν θα τους έδιναν δουλειά ή θα τους απέλυαν, μα δεν παύουν να καθιστούν διακρίσεις με τρομερές συνέπειες καθώς το άτομο εσωτερικεύει το στίγμα και αισθάνεται υποτίμηση, ντροπή και δυσφορία. Εμφανίζει επίσης συμπεριφορές απόσυρσης και απόκρυψης και πολλοί ασθενείς μπορεί να οδηγηθούν σε άγχος, κατάθλιψη, χαμηλή αυτοεκτίμηση. Έτσι, εκτός από την ίδια τη νόσο οι ογκολογικοί ασθενείς έχουν να αντιμετωπίσουν το κοινωνικό στίγμα, την προκατάληψη και το φόβο της κοινωνίας. (e.g. Birenbaum, 1970; Crandall & Coleman, 1992; Lefebvre & Munro, 1986; Taylor, Lichtman & Wood, 1984). (Fife & Wright, 2000). Φυσικά εδώ πρέπει να τονίσουμε πως αυτό συμβαίνει σε κάποιους ασθενείς, άλλοι σε αντίθεση, όχι μόνο δεν εσωτερικεύουν το στίγμα μα πεισμώνουν περισσότερο σ αυτό που ξέρουν ότι είναι και κινητοποιούνται κ αναδεικνύονται. Πόσοι π.χ. ιδρύουν συλλόγους κ μάχονται για την ισότητα.



Το ενδιαφέρον όμως είναι ότι και όσοι διακρίνουν και στιγματίζουν, επηρεάζονται. Γεμίζει η ψυχή τους αρνητισμό, λύπηση, αμηχανία, πικρία, θυμό. Ο αρνητικός εαυτός τους, τους κατακλύζει και πολλές φορές νιώθουν αηδία με τα δικά τους συναισθήματα ή και ντροπή. Μειώνουν τις ευκαιρίες τους για νέες γνωριμίες, εμπειρίες, εξέλιξη. Επηρεάζεται μάλιστα και η συμπεριφορά τους καθώς μπορεί να οδηγηθούν σε διακρίσεις οι ίδιοι ή να γίνουν επιθετικοί κ απόλυτοι.

Κ ας μην ξεχνάμε τα στερεότυπα των ίδιων των ασθενών προς τον περίγυρο. Η προκαταβολική σιγουριά πως θα τους λυπηθούν ή θα προσφέρουν βοήθεια από οίκτο κ όχι επειδή πραγματικά νοιάζονται κ συμπονούν. Η δυσκολία των ίδιων των ασθενών να εμπιστευτούν τις καλές προθέσεις των άλλων ή η διάθεσή τους να ζητούν αυτό που θέλουν.



Πώς μπορούμε να μειώσουμε την προκατάληψη;

Αρχικά, είναι σημαντικό να τονίσουμε πως υπάρχουν τρόποι να ξεφύγουμε από τις προκαταλήψεις μας αρκεί να το θέλουμε.

-Τα στερεότυπά μας μπορούν να αλλάξουν όταν εκτεθούμε σε πληροφορίες που τα διαψεύδουν. Επομένως:

Ενημέρωση, εκπαίδευση, περισσότερες ημερίδες κ συμμετοχή σ αυτές. Μόνο έτσι μπορούν να αντικρουστούν εσφαλμένες αντιλήψεις κ να ενθαρρυνθεί η χρήση θετικών περιστατικών. Να αναφερόμαστε σε ανθρώπους με καρκίνο και να υπογραμμίζουμε ότι ο καρκίνος μπορεί να αντιμετωπιστεί. Να δίνουμε έμφαση στις ικανότητες και όχι στους περιορισμούς των ασθενών μα πάνω απ’όλα να Μιλάμε για τον καρκίνο. Να σπάει ο φαύλος κύκλος της μυστικοπάθειας κ της ντροπής που στιγματίζει από μόνη της. Έτσι, αυτομάτως παύουμε να εξισώνουμε τον ασθενή με ασθένεια του. Πάει να είναι ο καρκινοπαθής αλλά ένας άνθρωπος επαγγελματίας, γονέας, αθλητής που τυγχάνει να πάσχει από καρκίνο το συγκεκριμένο χρονικό διάστημα.



-Τα στερεότυπα αλλάζουν όταν ερχόμαστε σε επαφή με άτομα από διάφορες ομάδες. Έτσι μαθαίνουν και μαθαίνουμε από αυτούς, παύουμε να φοβόμαστε και βλέπουμε και τις ομοιότητές μας πέρα από τις διαφορές. Στόχος λοιπόν είναι η Επικοινωνία (Να κάνουμε διάλογο με τους συνανθρώπους μας. Να ρωτάμε, να απαντάμε, να κατανοούμε, να διδάσκουμε, να διδασκόμαστε).



-Φυσικά όλοι μας πρέπει πάντα να λειτουργούμε μέσα σε κοινωνικά και θεσμικά πλαίσια που ενισχύουν την ισότητα κ εδώ έρχεται ο ρόλος της κοινωνίας κ των θεσμών. Π.χ. στην τηλεόραση περισσότεροι ηλικιωμένοι ή ομοφυλόφιλοι ή καρκινοπαθείς.

Άρα λοιπόν, είναι σημαντικό πάντα να θυμόμαστε πως όλοι μας είμαστε διαφορετικοί. Εκεί έγκειται η ομορφιά και η μοναδικότητά μας. Όλοι μας όμως πέρα από την διαφορετικότητά μας είμαστε ίσοι. Θα πρέπει λοιπόν πάντα εμείς ατομικά να αναρωτιόμαστε: Τι μπορούμε να κάνουμε εδώ κ τώρα για να μειώσουμε τη δική μας προκατάληψη;


ΠΗΓΗ:

Απόσπασμα από Ημερίδα ‘Ψυχική υγεία και δικαιώματα στο δρόμο του καρκίνου’. 21.1.18, Σύλλογος ‘ΜΑΖΙ ΣΟΥ’, Καστοριά.


Friday 19 January 2018

Researchers say this 5-minute technique could help you fall asleep more quickly




You’ve had all day to worry, but your brain decides that the moment you rest your weary head upon your pillow is the precise instant it wants to start fretting. The result of course is that you feel wide awake and cannot sleep. Two possible solutions: (1) spend five minutes before lights out writing about everything you have done. This might give you a soothing sense of achievement. Or (2) spend five minutes writing a comprehensive to-do list. This could serve to off-load your worries, or perhaps it will only make them more salient? To find out which is the better strategy, a team led by Michael Scullin at Baylor University, invited 57 volunteers to their sleep lab and had half of them try technique 1 and half try technique 2. Their findings are published in the latest issue of the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.



The participants, aged 18 to 30, attended the sleep lab at about 9pm on a weekday night. They filled out questionnaires about their usual sleep habits and underwent basic medical tests. Once in their sound-proofed room and wired up to equipment that uses brain waves to measure sleep objectively, they were told that lights out would be 10.30pm. Before they tried to sleep, half of the participants spent five minutes “writing about everything you have to remember to do tomorrow and over the next few days”. The others spent the same time writing about any activities they’d completed that day and over the previous few days.

The key finding is that the participants in the to-do list condition fell asleep more quickly. They took about 15 minutes to fall asleep, on average, compared with 25 minutes for those in the “jobs already done” condition. Moreover, among those in the to-do list group, the more thorough and specific their list, the more quickly they fell asleep, which would seem to support a kind of off-loading explanation. Another interpretation is that busier people, who had more to write about, tended to fall asleep more quickly. But this is undermined by the fact that among the jobs-done group, those who wrote in more detail tended to take longer to fall asleep.

“Rather than journal about the day’s completed tasks or process tomorrow’s to-do list in one’s mind, the current experiment suggests that individuals spend five minutes near bedtime thoroughly writing a to-do list,” the researchers said.

Unfortunately, the experiment didn’t have a baseline no-intervention control group, so it’s possible that the shorter time-to-sleep of the to-do list writing intervention was actually a reflection of journaling about completed jobs making it harder to fall asleep. Also, note the current sample didn’t have any sleep problems. Scullin and his team say the next step is to conduct a longer-running randomised control trial of the to-do list intervention outside of the sleep lab, with people who do and don’t have sleep-onset insomnia.

SOURCE:

Monday 15 January 2018

10 Λόγοι που σας κρατούν μακριά από τον οργασμό






Οργασμός! Πόσες γυναίκες δεν μπαίνουν στο κυνήγι του οργασμού; Πόσες γυναίκες ενώ θέλουν να κορυφώσουν δεν μπορούν; Τι φταίει; Τι μπορεί να απειλήσει, να υπονομεύσει ή να καταστρέψει τον οργασμό σας;

Η εικόνα σώματος: Γνωρίζουμε όλες μας πολύ καλά πόσο σημαντικό είναι το να νιώθουμε άνετα με το σώμα μας. Είναι λοιπόν μία πραγματικότητα πως η εικόνα που έχει μία γυναίκα για το σώμα της είναι καθοριστικής σημασίας, για το αν θα φτάσει σε οργασμό ή όχι. Σκεφτείτε, εάν εσείς η ίδια έχετε αρνητική εικόνα του εαυτού σας, εάν δεν νιώθετε άνετα με το σώμα σας ή τα γεννητικά σας όργανα, τότε πώς θα μπορέσετε να αφεθείτε στο παιχνίδι αναζήτησης της ηδονής, όταν βρίσκεστε μαζί με το σύντροφό σας;
Ο αυνανισμός: Ο αυνανισμός είναι μια απόλυτα φυσιολογική διαδικασία που βοηθά τις γυναίκες να γνωρίσουν το σώμα τους και να ενισχύσουν τη σεξουαλικότητά τους. Είναι απαραίτητο λοιπόν, να μη φοβάστε να αγγίξετε το σώμα σας, να χαϊδεύετε τα γεννητικά σας όργανα και τις ερωτογενείς σας ζώνες (στήθος, κοιλιά, μηροί, κτλ). Αν λειτουργείτε με ταμπού και ενοχοποίηση προφανώς δεν θα αφεθείτε στο να γνωρίσετε το σώμα σας και τι είναι αυτό που σας αρέσει.
Φαντασιώσεις: Εσείς αλήθεια, τι σκέφτεστε όταν κάνετε σεξ; Εάν σκέφτεστε τι φαγητό θα μαγειρέψετε αύριο ή εάν πρέπει να σβήσετε κανένα φως για να μην φαίνεται η κυτταρίτιδά σας και σας απομυθοποιήσει το έτερον σας ήμισυ, τότε θα πρέπει να αποχαιρετήσετε τον οργασμό σας. Προσπαθήστε κατά τη διάρκεια της σεξουαλικής επαφής ή του αυνανισμού, να κρατάτε οποιαδήποτε σκέψη μακριά και να εστιάζετε στη στιγμή. Φαντασιωθείτε κάτι που σας εξιτάρει, που σας διεγείρει, πρόσωπα, εικόνες, σκηνικά. Έτσι, όχι μόνο θα καταφέρετε να χαλαρώσετε και να αφεθείτε περισσότερο, αλλά το πιο πιθανόν είναι να διεγερθείτε και πιο πολύ, αυξάνοντας τις πιθανότητες να φτάσετε σε οργασμό.
Προκαταρκτικά παιχνίδια: Όταν βρίσκεστε με το σύντροφό σας πηγαίνετε κατευθείαν στο ψητό ή αφιερώνετε χρόνο για αγκαλιές, χάδια και φιλιά σε διάφορα σημεία του σώματος, πριν προχωρήσετε στη συνουσία; Είναι σημαντικό, προκειμένου να φτάσετε σε οργασμό, να έχει προηγηθεί επαρκής διέγερση, που εκδηλώνεται κυρίως μέσω της κολπικής εφύγρανσης και της διεύρυνσης των τοιχωμάτων του κόλπου. Την επόμενη φορά λοιπόν, που θα βρεθείτε με το σύντροφό σας, ζητήστε του να σας κάνει στοματικό σεξ, να σας αγγίξει, να σας φιλήσει, να παίξει μαζί σας και αφεθείτε απολαμβάνοντας το κάθε άγγιγμα.
Μη ικανοποιητική σεξουαλική επαφή: Υπάρχουν γυναίκες που δεν τους αρέσει ο τρόπος με τον οποίο κάνουν σεξ με το σύντροφό τους και οι ίδιες διστάζουν να ζητήσουν ανοιχτά αυτό που θέλουν να αλλάξει ή να διορθώσει. Αυτό είναι λάθος. Το σεξ γίνεται για την απόλαυση και των δύο γι’ αυτό μην ντρέπεστε να διεκδικήσετε αυτό που επιθυμείτε.
Σχέση με το σύντροφο: Έχετε σκεφτεί εάν σας ελκύει ερωτικά ο σύντροφός σας; Σας αρέσει; Τον φαντασιώνεστε; Τον ποθείτε; Το πώς νιώθετε για τον άνθρωπο που έχετε απέναντί σας επηρεάζει, όπως είναι λογικό και την σεξουαλική σας λειτουργία. Καλός ή κακώς, ο οργασμός δεν απαιτεί μόνο «τεχνική», αλλά είναι μία εγκεφαλική διαδικασία που επηρεάζεται άμεσα από τις σκέψεις και τα συναισθήματα που έχουμε. Έτσι, εάν δεν νιώθετε άνετα με το σύντροφό σας, εάν η σχέση σας είναι συγκρουσιακή και δεν υπάρχει επικοινωνία ανάμεσά σας, εάν απουσιάζει η ψυχική επαφή, τότε είναι πιθανόν να μην καταφέρετε να αντλήσετε ευχαρίστηση και από το σεξουαλικό παιχνίδι.
Άγχος, στρες, κατάθλιψη: Όταν παρουσιάζονται αυτές οι καταστάσεις, υπάρχει άμεση επίδραση στη σεξουαλική σας ζωή τις περισσότερες φορές, καθώς, βλέπετε την ερωτική σας επιθυμία να μειώνεται κατακόρυφα και τον οργασμό σας να σας αποχαιρετά. Βέβαια, μπορεί μία γυναίκα να μην έχει ερωτική επιθυμία, αλλά να φτάνει σε οργασμό, ωστόσο το πιο σύνηθες είναι αυτά τα δύο να συνυπάρχουν.
Σεξουαλική κακοποίηση: Εάν μία γυναίκα έχει βιώσει κάποια έντονη τραυματική εμπειρία, όπως βιασμό η σεξουαλική παρενόχληση, είναι πιθανόν να επηρεαστεί και η οργασμική της ικανότητα, καθώς πιθανόν το σεξ να της προκαλεί αποστροφή.
Αυστηρό οικογενειακό περιβάλλον, θρησκευτικές καταβολές, λανθασμένες αντιλήψεις για το σεξ και ανεπαρκής σεξουαλικής διαπαιδαγώγηση: Όλα αυτά μπορεί να οδηγήσουν στην πεποίθηση πως το σεξ είναι κακό, πως είναι μία ανήθικη πράξη και πως πρέπει να αποσκοπεί μόνο στην αναπαραγωγή και όχι στην ηδονή.
Οργανικά αίτια: Ορισμένες ιατρικές καταστάσεις, όπως είναι οι ορμονικές μεταβολές, π.χ. λόγω της εμμηνόπαυσης, η χημειοθεραπεία, ο υποθυρεοειδισμός, κάποιος τραυματισμός της σπονδυλικής στήλης, η λήψη φαρμακευτικής αγωγής και κυρίως, αντικαταθλιπτικών φαρμάκων, η κατάχρηση αλκοόλ και ναρκωτικών ουσιών, είναι μερικά από τα αίτια που δύνανται να επηρεάσουν την σεξουαλική επιθυμία, τη διέγερση και επομένως, τον οργασμό της γυναίκας.

Ο γυναικείος οργασμός είναι μία περίπλοκη λειτουργία και απαιτεί τόσο σωματική όσο και ψυχική συμμετοχή. Εάν νιώθετε ότι συντρέχει κάποιος από τους παραπάνω παράγοντες και σας εμποδίζει να βιώσετε αυτό το συναίσθημα της ηδονικής απόλαυσης και ευχαρίστησης, καλό θα ήταν να αναζητήσετε τη βοήθεια ενός ειδικού.

ΠΗΓΗ:
http://www.askitis.gr/sexualhealth/view/10_logoi_poi_sas_kratoin_makria_apo_ton_orgasmo(accessed 15.1.18)

Thursday 11 January 2018

Here’s what the evidence shows about the links between creativity and depression





There’s a stereotype that mental distress is an almost inevitable part of being highly creative. But is there any substance to this idea, or have we been misled – by biographers drawn to artists with colourful and chaotic lives, and the conceits of cultural movements like the romantics?

Scientific attempts to resolve this question, which have mainly focused on disorders of mood, have so far struggled to reach a definitive answer. However, in a new reviewin Perspectives on Psychological Science, Christa Taylor of Albany State University has applied surgical precision to open up the existing body of research and lay out what we currently know.



Taylor identified 36 studies on the creativity-mood disorder relationship from a set of almost 3000 that were potentially relevant. She combined data from these different studies into into separate “meta-analyses”, depending on the specific question she was trying to address. We can be confident in the findings from these meta-analyses because they involved data from thousands or even millions of participants.

Taylor first looked at whether creative people are more likely to have a mood disorder compared to non-creative controls. She looked at data from from ten studies involving fine arts students, creative writers, and eminent figures from creative fields, and found that yes, there was a clear relationship between being creative and having a diagnosis of a mood disorder, such as depression (overall the association had a moderate-to-large effect size). This finding held across different ways of measuring creativity, such as musical performance or tests of divergent thinking (finding new ideas or solutions). Creativity was most commonly associated with bipolar disorder (a condition marked by periods of low and high mood). It was not associated with all mood disorders – for instance, dysthymic disorder (mood depression that is longer-lasting but milder in nature than clinical depression) was no more common among creative people than controls.

To address a slightly different question – compared to healthy controls, are people with a clinical diagnosis of mood disorder more creative? – Taylor used a second meta-analysis combining 13 studies, including a set of mega-studies involving millions of people. The answer was a quavering no, not really. Overall, differences in creativity between people with mood disorder and control were statistically non-significant. Taylor only detected any meaningful differences by narrowing the definition of creativity – people with mood disorders scored higher for painting ability, for instance, but not for many other measures, such as on laboratory tests of creativity, for example. Focusing on specific disorders, Taylor found some evidence for superior creativity among those with bipolar disorder and major depression (but still the differences from controls were modest).

The new findings appear contradictory, but to simplify, they suggest that creative people are indeed liable to mood disorder, but overall there is little evidence that a mood disorder makes you more creative.

Some reasons why this might be:

Perhaps mood disorder is a boon to creativity, but this benefit is typically buried under a host of disadvantages and so doesn’t show up in most studies. (Compare with the clutch of successful people who attribute their success to struggles in early life; their existence doesn’t mean that we should expect disadvantage to reliably yield success.)

If low mood does have a (often hidden) beneficial effect on creativity, one possibility is that it can initiate reflections that lead to new ways of seeing the world. This could explain why the deep dives of depression were associated with higher creativity but the chronic, less extensive dip of dysthemia was not. Moreover, by combining lows with motivation-charged highs, perhaps bipolar disorder combines the deep dives with a return to the surface, giving a chance for these insights to manifest.

An alternative explanation for the new findings is that mood disorder doesn’t help creativity at all, but creativity creates mood disorder as a by-product. The lifestyle required in many creative fields can be punishing – I’m thinking of the musicians and stand-ups who spend most nights in Holiday Inns or on unfamiliar sofas; the financial instability and tournament-like nature of many artistic fields; the profligate substance misuse. The first meta-analysis showed that as mood disorder symptoms topped out, creativity actually dropped off, which could fit with this picture (but could also fit the boon-plus-disadvantage model, if the boon was only activated by mild symptoms).

Finally, it could be that being creative just makes you appear clinically abnormal. Taylor points out this could happen in an affected manner, to “play creative”, but could also be because many aspects of the “flow state” – extended bursts of activity, disregarding the need for sleep or food, absorption or attentional wandering, rapidly flowing thoughts – are also treated as markers of bipolar disorder.

This research doesn’t fully resolve the long-running questions about whether and how mood disorders and creativity are linked, but it does pour water on some perspectives, such as expecting those struggling with a disorder to thrive creatively. Where the results are most unambiguous is in the higher incidence of disorder in creative people, which yields clear questions for future research, such as whether this is related to how strongly a culture makes assumptions about the temperament of “real artists”. And for you and me, it’s an important reminder that headlines like “creative people tend to get blue” does not imply that “being blue, you tend to get creative”.


SOURCE:

Tuesday 9 January 2018

The Modern Parenting Techniques That Hinder Brain Development






…plus the ancient parenting practices repeatedly linked to positive brain development.



Modern parenting practices and cultural beliefs are hurting children’s development, a child psychology expert argues.

Professor Darcia Narvaez of the University of Notre Dame, who studies how early life experiences affect brain development, said:


“Life outcomes for American youth are worsening, especially in comparison to 50 years ago.

Ill-advised practices and beliefs have become commonplace in our culture, such as the use of infant formula, the isolation of infants in their own rooms or the belief that responding too quickly to a fussing baby will ‘spoil’ it.”

Set against these, some ancient parenting practices have been repeatedly linked to positive brain development.

Professor Narvaez explained:


“Breast-feeding infants, responsiveness to crying, almost constant touch and having multiple adult caregivers are some of the nurturing ancestral parenting practices that are shown to positively impact the developing brain, which not only shapes personality, but also helps physical health and moral development.”



For example, research has shown that:
Positive touch reduces stress in children.
Responding to babies needs is linked to the development of consciousness.
Free play in nature reduces aggression.
A set of supportive caregivers may boost IQ and empathy.

Despite this, children in the US are now less likely to be breastfed, are not held as much as they were and free play has reduced dramatically since the 1970s.


On top of this, extended families have been broken up by economic and social forces.


This means children do not see as many of their relatives as they used to.

Professor Narvaez said:



“The right brain, which governs much of our self-regulation, creativity and empathy, can grow throughout life.

The right brain grows though full-body experience like rough-and-tumble play, dancing or freelance artistic creation.

So at any point, a parent can take up a creative activity with a child and they can grow together.”

SOURCE:

The research was presented at the University of Notre Dame in 2012 


Thursday 4 January 2018

Onassis Cultural Centre share reflections and learning


As they prepare to host Greece's first dance festival featuring disabled artists and companies from different countries in Europe, Christos Carras (Executive Director) and Myrto Lavda (Head of Educational Programs) reflect on a programme of work that has included access training for their staff and other culture professionals, the development of Greece's first integrated dance groups, and the positioning of disabled artists and companies within a mainstream arts programme.



Issues relating to access, both physical and institutional are particularly important in Greece, a country where informal and family networks often bear the brunt of responsibilities that the state has not managed or tried sufficiently to come to terms with. During recent years, which have seen public funding and infrastructure become even less reliable, these issues have been exacerbated. This period has seen private institutions, such as the Onassis Cultural Centre, financed by the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation, take a prominent and visible role within the sectors in which they are active, in our instance contemporary culture.



This increased presence obliges you to reflect upon your position and responsibility as a cultural agent: what kind of institution are you and how do you interact with the society in which you operate? What exactly can you do about issues you identify as pressing? At what levels can you make a difference? As is often the case, it is useful to start this questioning at the smallest level and move up; as the saying goes, the first step (and by no means the easiest) towards changing the world is to change yourself.



Engaging in a project like Unlimited Access obliges you to take stock of how you score on issues of access: the space may comply with legislation, but how accessible is it really? The staff may be really friendly and caring (ours is!), but how well trained are they in welcoming disabled people to the Centre? We may be committed to reaching out to the broadest possible audience through our communication and media, but to what degree do we cater to the needs of visually impaired or learning disabled audiences? Honest answers to the above will lead to a full agenda of actions to implement for almost any institution. It is an ongoing process but we have already made modifications to the building and started a series of targeted staff training programs.



Going a step further: what cultural services do you provide for disabled people and how?

Two fundamental guidelines support our thinking and practice at this level:
If one of the main issues is segregation, then focusing on integrated workshops and other activities that bring together groups (children or adults) including both disabled and non-disabled people is essential to breaking down the barriers of apprehension and incomprehension that pervade their relationships.

Try to avoid thematic or aesthetic patronizing that, at the end of the day, is another form of discrimination. The programs that are designed for integrated groups, whilst not feigning not to see differences, should never be simplistic or condescending: the aesthetic and technical goals should be of the same standard as the organization applies across the range of its actions.
Following on from this, the need to bring disabled arts into the “mainstream” of contemporary culture should be constantly reasserted. To what degree do you integrate productions and performances related to disability into the central focus of your programming? Or on the contrary, to what degree do they represent something “extra”?

The questions posed by disabled arts, the different narratives, the challenges to our conceptions of body and agency are indeed special, but relegating them to a “special” section of the program can lead to marginalizing their relevance and significance. At the OCC world class productions such as Ganesh versus the Third Reich (Back to Back Theatre co.) or Disabled Theatre (Jérôme Bel / Theatre Hora) as well as many workshops for people of all ages are part of our core program.



And how can you engage in the public discussion about disability issues?

As a cultural centre you develop media for reaching out to your public. By bringing the practices of disabled artists into the stream of information, you can certainly raise awareness, in both a positive and critical mode. Apart from the performative dimension, it is possible to integrate public discussions and other actions that focus on disability issues. And in one sense, by virtue of not being a “specialist” institution, you can play an important role as a mainstream forum that brings issues out of the often antagonistic and sometimes introverted environment of agencies and representative bodies and into the mainstream.

A cultural centre can not remedy the challenges faced by disabled people at all levels of their lives, nor indeed effect change at all levels of society, but as we have discovered through our engagement both with other organisations and above all with the extraordinarily inspiring people from the disabled communities that we work with, consciously approaching these problems within your own scope of work is already a tremendously challenging, important and rewarding step.



The Onassis Cultural Centre opened in Athens in December 2010 and is a modern cultural space hosting events and actions across the whole spectrum of the arts : from theatre, dance, music and the visual arts to the written word, with an emphasis on contemporary cultural expression, on supporting Greek artists, on cultivating international collaborations and on educating children and people of all ages through life-long learning.

SOURCE:



Evidence For Higher State of Consciousness Found



The first study to show higher brain-signal diversity than normal when people are awake.



Neuroscientists have found that the brain enters a ‘higher state of consciousness’ under the influence of psychedelic drugs.

People given psilocybin, ketamine and LSD under controlled conditions displayed more diverse neural signalling — a measure of the complexity of brain activity.

This is the first study to show higher brain-signal diversity than normal when people are awake.

Professor Anil Seth, one of the study’s authors, said:


“This finding shows that the brain-on-psychedelics behaves very differently from normal.

During the psychedelic state, the electrical activity of the brain is less predictable and less ‘integrated’ than during normal conscious wakefulness – as measured by ‘global signal diversity’.

Since this measure has already shown its value as a measure of ‘conscious level’, we can say that the psychedelic state appears as a higher ‘level’ of consciousness than normal – but only with respect to this specific mathematical measure.”

The neuroscientists pointed out that this work does not imply that the higher state of consciousness is ‘better’ than the normal state — just different.

Dr Robin Cahart-Harris, study co-author, said:




“The present study’s findings help us understand what happens in people’s brains when they experience an expansion of their consciousness under psychedelics.

People often say they experience insight under these drugs – and when this occurs in a therapeutic context, it can predict positive outcomes.

The present findings may help us understand how this can happen.”

Professor Seth said:



“We found correlations between the intensity of the psychedelic experience, as reported by volunteers, and changes in signal diversity.

This suggests that our measure has close links not only to global brain changes induced by the drugs, but to those aspects of brain dynamics that underlie specific aspects of conscious experience.”

SOURCE:

The study was published in the journal Scientific Reports (Schartner et al., 2017).


Tuesday 2 January 2018

Positive parenting gets “under the skin”, showing up years later in the cortisol response


Adolescence is when values and relationships are formed and things happen that leave their sticky fingerprints on the life that follows. Even, it seems, in the everyday functioning of brain systems. New research published in Developmental Science shows that when teenagers have a positive relationship with their parents, then as adults their brains and bodies respond to stress in a way that helps them better engage with the world. However, the study suggests this benefit may be denied to those raised in a rough environment, which seems to override the influence of positive parenting.




The researchers, led by Elizabeth Shirtcliff of Iowa State University, studied hundreds of people from Seattle, USA, who, when they were teenagers, had described their relations with their parents through questions like “are you close to your mother?” Trained raters also scored how much encouragement and appropriate reward they received from their parents, based on videos taken of the teens and their parents completing various structured tasks.




Some five years later, 280 of the then-teens, now aged between 19 and 22 years, provided saliva samples to Shirtcliff’s team to gauge their cortisol levels. Cortisol is a key indicator of HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) activity, which governs our sensitivity to new information and stressors. After controlling for variables such as gender, family income, and sleep habits, the researchers wanted to see how cortisol was related to the measures of teen-parent relations.


Early in the analysis it became clear that although the White (European American) and Black (African American) participants in the sample had received similar quality parental care, there were different patterns within these ethnic groups, so the researchers separated them before analysing the results further.




Among the European Americans, having a positive relationship when they were teenagers with their parents, together with observer ratings of having received greater praise and reward from their parents, were all associated with showing higher cortisol levels on waking in young adulthood.


It might seem surprising that better teen care would be associated with higher cortisol levels in adulthood – and this certainly contrasts with work on infancy, where high quality care leads to a dampened HPA response. But remember that cortisol stimulates greater attention and alertness. Higher cortisol isn’t much use, or much fun, for a helpless infant already drowning in novelty, so knowing a caregiver will deal with your stress helps them avoid pointless panic at every new detail. However, Shirtcliff and her colleagues think that this sensitive, high-waking cortisol profile, apparently promoted by positive parenting, might generally be advantageous in adult life, helping you notice nuances in human behaviour and drink in the details a little more deeply. In the absence of positive parental relations to buffer stress, in contrast, the HPA system dials down the cortisol response as a protective measure.




Meanwhile, there was little evidence of a high-cortisol profile in any of the African American participants. The results were somewhat mixed, but overall this seemed to be regardless of the quality of the family care they’d received as teenagers. The researchers speculated that this might because the African American participants had been exposed to more early life challenges than the White participants – related to housing, crime, access to resources – that were enough to put them into the protective, self-buffering mode, even if they’d had the most supportive and positive relationship with their parents.


The research suggests that poorer care during upbringing can cast a long shadow, distancing us as adults from everyday experience, both urgent and enjoyable. On the other hand, positive parenting seems to have benefits that last into adulthood. But the apparent lack of this benefit among the African American participants challenges the predominantly right-wing suggestion that the long-term problems faced by minorities can be primarily addressed by remedying the greater familial breakdown seen in some ethnic minority groups.

SOURCE: